|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Don't weld or weld near bearings. The grease has a bad habit of lighting on fire.
Quote:
Press fitting refers to having a hole that's just slightly smaller than the diameter of the bearing, so when you press it in, it doesn't come out. It's kind of tough to figure out what size hole to make and then make it accurately (within a few tenths). Last edited by Gray Adams : 01-10-2012 at 23:09. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
Typically, teams press fit bearing, as opposed to welding them. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
And what is "press fitting"? Could you elaborate. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
I can't think of another drive that would be lighter than a WCD other than a super pocketed sheet drive. I'm curious to see the weight comparison and sheet drive. But WCD is decently light due to the fact: -No outer Railing -Minimal amount of parts. -Smaller parts: Wheels/Sprockets/Gearboxes etc.... We switched over to WCD in the fall of 2010. Never looked back (thanks 973!), its such a nice system that 254/968 has perfected over the years. -RC |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
While not the traditional wcd, doing one with fixed wheels and belts would without a doubt result in the lightest drivesystem in FIRST.
That said there is really no right or wrong answer. Do what works best for you. If your main manufacturing resources are sheetmetal then WCD might not be the best choice. It is possible and we have actually run a sheet WCD before but it's not the best use of resources. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|