|
Re: Ideal robot speed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether
|
I've found that having both the 2004 version and a current version really help in demonstrating the results of different design choices. Or to say it another way, it really helps when making a design choice.
The 2004 version is not quite as clean, but that drawback actually allows you to see "behind the curtain", so to speak, in how the resultant data is generated.
__________________
CalGames 2009 Autonomous Champion Award winner
Sacramento 2010 Creativity in Design winner, Sacramento 2010 Quarter finalist
2011 Sacramento Finalist, 2011 Madtown Engineering Inspiration Award.
2012 Sacramento Semi-Finals, 2012 Sacramento Innovation in Control Award, 2012 SVR Judges Award.
2012 CalGames Autonomous Challenge Award winner ($$$).
2014 2X Rockwell Automation: Innovation in Control Award (CVR and SAC). Curie Division Gracious Professionalism Award.
2014 Capital City Classic Winner AND Runner Up. Madtown Throwdown: Runner up.
2015 Innovation in Control Award, Sacramento.
2016 Chezy Champs Finalist, 2016 MTTD Finalist
|
We also indirectly benefit from those rookie teams having well-built and working drivebases. It helps raise the level of performance across the board, making for a better competitive environment.
- Alan Anderson [more] 
Hybrid Mode
