|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
I think the KoP drive speed is very good this year and I don't see much of a reason to go more slowly, especially with the KoP drive using relatively precise belts. It's a good balance of speed and "pushing power".
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
Quote:
Quote:
From reading <R13> and <R19>, it appears to me that structures/gearboxes from previous years' robots are legal as long as A. The structure/gearbox is unchanged from original purchase OR B. The structure/gearbox has been adapted specifically for this year's game (which is to say if you have a piece of C-Channel from 2011, unchanged, it's legal. If you have a piece of C-Channel used on your 2011 robot and you cut it again for the 2013 robot, it's legal. If you custom-cut a piece of C-Channel for your 2011 robot and are using it unchanged from 2011, it's illegal.) Although the motors allowed are restricted to the table in <R32>, there are no restrictions on gearboxes provided they meet <R16> and <R19> |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
If your are stalled (0 RPM) the gear ratio has no effect on motor current. You will have a higher pushing force available with the higher ratio. (Newton will insist that if you are not accelerating the net force between the robots is 0). Other wise for a given output torque a higher (numerical) reduction will have the motor spinning faster at a lower torque therefore less current.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
Quote:
hey, i would like to know where you found out that the old kop chassis is illegal, would you mind showing me where it says it? my team was thinking about using an old channel that we had lying around the shop. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
There is a section in the rules about reusing KOP from previous years. For the channels you basically have to account for the cost in the bill of materials.
It also has not to have been "modified" before kickoff. It is up to your GP to decide just what that means. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
The old KoP chassis will not fit the frame perimter rules. COTS materials from the KoP chassis are still legal, just not the entire kit.
And Ether, thank you for clearing up my confusion. I believe I understand the relationship between motors, torque, and current a lot better now. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
Quote:
If you haven't seen it yet, here's a little motor calculator I wrote a while back that may give you further insight. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
The chart James posted is a GREAT introduction to drive design, and I recommend everyone read it. That said, if you don't plan on continuous pushing, you can safely bring a single speed into the 10-13 feet per second range without too many problems. Just remember the faster you gear, the less versatile you are in terms of pushing.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toughbox vs KOP Toughbox Mini
Quote:
Nothing substitutes doing the math if you're uncertain or want to try something unconventional. In 2009 we ran our drivetrain on 2 Banebots RS550 motors because the math worked out. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|