|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
For the CMP slots, I feel that the 30:147 and 18:190 equations are going to have to change. I see a ratio of about 1:7, meaning NEF=21, MAR=14 and FiM=27. If I were in MI, I'd be howling very loudly at being punished for the successful growing of FRC. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
FiM should be on the phone figuring out why FiNE gets 12 more slots with 50 fewer teams. I saw that number and my jaw dropped.
If multiple regions are going to switch over to districts soon, why not start accurately apportioning slots? Just saying "You had x regionals for 6x slots before, so you're stuck with that number" sounds careless. However, as someone who has been watching district models developing in multiple areas, I always like to see progress. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
From the proposal:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
I agree that it looks really good.
The one thing I am disappointed in at this point is that there is only 1 EI slot but 2 RAS and 5 CA. To be fair to the importance of that award I think it should be 2 EI at least. Especially since the other awards give you points to put toward your total to compete for the other slots available but EI, CA, and RAS do not. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|