Go to Post Hyper, I want to marry your robot. - Keys [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy > Scouting
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2013, 18:46
xSAWxBLADEx's Avatar
xSAWxBLADEx xSAWxBLADEx is offline
DaBears til 13 turned Free Agent 14
AKA: Michael Hawley
no team (Free Agent)
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Berkley, MI
Posts: 359
xSAWxBLADEx will become famous soon enoughxSAWxBLADEx will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to xSAWxBLADEx
OPR, and CCWM 2013

Did the calculation for the OPR/CCWM change for 2013? If so, what is the calculation for those?
__________________
2006-Palmetto Regional Champions with 11 and 1251 (MORT, TIGERS, BEARS, O MY!)
2007-Pittsburgh Regional Champions with 123 and 337 / Detroit Regional Champions with 123 and 903
2009-Traverse City District Competition Champions with 85 and 2645 / Traverse City District Competition Chairman's Award / Michigan State Championship Finalists with 1918 and 904 / Championship Finalist with 217 and 68
2013-Grand Blanc District Competition Champions with 33 and 1718

  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2013, 10:57
stingray27's Avatar
stingray27 stingray27 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Michael Ray
FRC #0027 (Team RUSH)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 209
stingray27 is a name known to allstingray27 is a name known to allstingray27 is a name known to allstingray27 is a name known to allstingray27 is a name known to allstingray27 is a name known to all
Re: OPR, and CCWM 2013

OPR and CCWM do not change. As long as there is a method of scoring two 3 team alliances, the method of getting OPR will remain the same. I will post any more info if anyone needs it.
__________________
Michael Ray
Team RUSH 27

Driving Record: 93-64-0 Best Finish: Finalist (x4 FiM Districts)
Coaching Record: 16-7-0 Best Finish: Winner (Kettering Invitationa)l

  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2013, 11:10
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,062
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: OPR, and CCWM 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by stingray27 View Post
OPR and CCWM do not change. As long as there is a method of scoring two 3 team alliances, the method of getting OPR will remain the same.
Here's the "formula":

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...0&postcount=36


  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2013, 11:45
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,149
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: OPR, and CCWM 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by xSAWxBLADEx View Post
Did the calculation for the OPR/CCWM change for 2013? If so, what is the calculation for those?
Not from previous years other than 2012. In 2012, a lot of folks assigned points for doing a Co-Op balance as the game would frequently take high point makers out of the action early to co-op.

In 2011, there was a ranking mechanism that made "close high scoring matches" favorable. Because of this, some teams would choose a strategy that would maximize their seeding poitns as opposed to maximizing their match points. This strategy tended to cause some inaccuracy with OPR, and a ton of inaccuracy with CCWM (in my opinion).
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:46.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi