|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
Quote:
Can anyone confirm this? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
I worry that for some teams attempting the 3rd level climb this may inadvertently mean no female drivers this year. If our team were picking a drive team that needed to have the height and upper body strength to safely remove a high climbing robot, without even a step stool, most if not all of the women that were on our drive team last year would be at a significant disadvantage this year. I hope there is some serious consideration of how the inflexibility in this rule as currently stated might end up affecting some students.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
Quote:
You can only have one main breaker. R38 requires that the main breaker be connected exactly as shown, which prevents installing a secondary. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
I read the unpowered to mean that you will not be able to enable the robot to lower it. Similar to past years. I can see the safety people requiring the robot to be powered off by the breaker though. I don't see anything that requires the venting of the pneumatic system. Depending on the design, that might be a way to lower your robot.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
Quote:
i would also add steel toed shoes/boots to your retrieval people. It might look funny but it works. Hard hats are ok but I would be more worried about dropping the robot on a foot/feet. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|