|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Quote:
How well are the Modulox gearboxes working out for you? The integration is pretty neat! Again, great start to what I'm sure will be a solid robot. Keep us posted! Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 19-01-2013 at 00:35. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Looks great, I can't wait to see what you put on top of it.
Mecanum Haters Gonna Hate™ |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
The Modulox has worked out very well. everything is Aluminum except the bearings and output shaft. We have discovered that chassis construction is very important to the success of the Mecanum drive. Both frames we have built were very rigid, square and durable. All of our cut dimensions are +- .010 and all of our bends are +-.030. All rivet locations were pre drilled and require very little modification for assembly. There are 125 3/16 blind rivets holding 9 parts together. With the CIMS the chassis weighs in at 43 lbs.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
For the pushing match argument against mecanums, how often are you in a straight pushing match during a match? The situation most people describe in making this argument is a six wheel tank drive bot pushing a helpless mecanum drive bot halfway across the field. Any mecanum bot that I've helped build might be pushed some, but with the right driver it would spin away from the pusher and be back down the field in no time.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Quote:
But frankly, you could put square wheels on this thing and it'd still look boss. I look forward to seeing the whole thing! |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
What other reason do you need? As long as you didn't choose it because you think it gives some competitive advantage, it's fine in my books.
Maybe this team isn't looking at becoming 1114 just yet, and they just want to have fun building a robot and learn something. It's not always about the competition with every team. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Did you make those wheels? They don't look like either Andymark or Vexpro Mecanum wheels.
Love the paint scheme The white rollers are a nice touch. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Beautiful. Love the color scheme. Hope mecanum works out for you.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
The positive aspects of mecanum are surely well known as well the negatives. Cool is quite often used for design inspiration. Harley Earl would certainly agree as well as many other great designers. The cool in the design attracts attention and gives us the opportunity to explain the building process and FIRST. It's a solid design, form-function-finish.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
Quote:
A little more content like this, however--the attention attractor for non-FIRSTers, the testing done so far, and other similar things--and the meaning is clear: you've looked at the alternatives and decided this is the one. Out of curiosity... is a matching shooter going on top? You've got 4 weeks to perfect that, and a driving base to work with. Or is there something else up your sleeves? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Rolling Chassis
I wish our chassis looked that good! Serious props, especially for a second year team. I think the subject of mecanum drive has been beaten to death, so I'm just going to sit back and admire that beautiful frame!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|