|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
I should have pointed out that I was assuming the other robot that yours "matches-up" against has a pre-loaded 3-disc autonomous, so it would be 42-18 before other robots factor in (giving you that 24 point lead). Your point is absolutely valid if the other robot scores zero.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Any videos out of eliminations yet? I checked BA and could find nothing.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
I'm sure more videos from this and other regionals will also appear soon... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Observation/learned - many teams still don't have reliable, or any in some instances, 10 point hangers.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
The most effective defenses I saw were mostly the cause of the offending robot. Too many times did I see teams try to push their way through a defender and waste lots of time doing that. I'm also seeing that the unprotected loading station seems to be the safest to reload frisbees.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Fortune favors the prepared.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
It also helps to have the robots shooting from different positions, not side by side. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Autonomous is critical. Its also fun to watch the barrage of discs going into the same goal - no need to coordinate timing to avoid mid-air collisions like last year!
Shooting from the pyramid seems a more robust strategy than from the feeder zone. You have options for feeding (floor, feeder stations at either corner) and shooting (left, right, center) and mobility (multiple paths to and from - harder to defend). Defense can slow you down, but can't shut you down. Full court shooting has only one place to go for shooting, takes time to set up, and can be blocked. 10 point hang is good. I fear that all the time and effort we put into a climber may have been for naught. Even if it works, it takes a lot of time and adds a lot of risk for a modest net gain. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
From my vantage point (read bedroom), I noticed quite a lot at BAE
Climbers: 30 pointers are not greatly viable. Instantly turns the match into a 2v3, where you start with a 30 point lead (you hope). 10 point is stronger because you can work with frisbees or play defense, and get 30 additional points if everyone hangs. Shooters: Long range is strong if you're good. Tower is strong if you do it well. Defense: From what little I saw on Saturday, the "defense" was ramming into other robots at midfield. Defending long rangers with tall robots is ideal. Hanging: Seems like a couple got away with ground touches, and I even saw one or two that looked to me like it was touching 3 zones while climbing. Penalties: with the lack of audio on the BAE stream, I couldn't exactly keep strong track of penalties, but when I saw something, it was accounted for (by and large). |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
1.) Scheduling gods exist when there are 65 teams at a regional.
2) Being a consistent shooter is something that's not being seen much, but a lot of teams can do it if they use their resources wisely. 3) Defense is not being played, but when it is, there is a severe impact on an alliance's offense when. 4) A 50 point dumper is not enough to offset an alliance with 2 good scorers that have 10 point hangs. Some of the more controversial stuff: 4) Referees are NOT calling the 10 point hang properly. I have videos of this, but in our Quarterfinals match 1-2 Team 1772 was not hung up properly, but they got the points, which ended up being the deciding factor and sending our quarterfinals to a 3rd match. 5) G30 exists, referees. Referees are not calling G30, and it's been affecting outcomes of matches! Our Quarterfinals match 1-3, 1772 infracted G30 5 different times, yet it was not called once. We tied that match 70-70, but because the referees instead called us for our human player putting a foot outside of the white line, we ended up losing 70-71, despite numerous infractions of G30 by 1772. I understand the referees can't see everything, but 5 blatant infractions of G30 shouldn't go unnoticed, and everytime a climb is suspicious, DO THE PAPER TEST! The toughest thing I had to do this afternoon was to help keep the students calm and explain to them the situation and about us getting unlucky. Toughest thing I have had to say. I'll post another thread about this issue with some videos to make sure that any referees on CD can be prepared. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Simple, feeder-station only fixed angle shooters with passive hangers like 862 can be very effective.
Last edited by Andrew Zeller : 03-03-2013 at 00:25. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
At least I don't remember winning Kettering. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
It was such a great way to start off this season, this is the first district win in 862 history. We we're ecstatic. Can't wait for West Michigan! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Yes that is what I meant. I just edited the post.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
Quote:
Let me be clear, holding a Week 1 event is not an enviable task, which is why even though the number of total FRC events has ballooned as of late, the Week 1 number is very hesitant to break 10. Palmetto is historically a later event, and I assume that the event will slot back into a Week 4 slot when it goes back to Charleston(?). I think that would be good for this event. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|