|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
What we learned from week 1
We certainly learned a lot up here in NH, but what did others learn across the country? Here's what I learned...
1) A robot with an intake for frisbees on the ground is going to do well as there are frisbees all over the field to pick up. 2) Most teams can either shoot well and hang for 10 points or just play defense and hang for 30. 3) A triple hang for 30 points each would be the coolest thing in FIRST history. 4) There is a major lack of variety in shooters this year, but a wide variety of hangers So what did you learn? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Watching on the web, I noticed that the majority of frisbees on the ground were right-side up.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
This year really leveled the playing field for teams
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Agreed. It's really easy to put up big points as a new team.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
There are multiple things a team can do to score a large amount of points-and things that require more than just a drivetrain(ie. balancing last year).
Automated live scoring isn't the blessing it was last year. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Never to do week 1 again.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
I am glad to be confirmed on this prediction. What a relief!
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
A robot that climbs and dumps for 50 points can be outscored a lot more easily than I anticipated.
Having more than two robots shooting in the same autonomous goal is a bad idea. Last edited by EricDrost : 02-03-2013 at 23:02. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
What exactly happened? Seems like a bot is either off the ground or it's not. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
1. Scoring in auton is big.
2. Not as many consistent shooters as i thought there would be. 3. Strong shooter>climber 4. There are a lot of Frisbee on the ground. 5. Penalties have been a serious factor in qualification. Specifically about contact with a robot in protected zone or while touching pyramid. 6. Hardly any effective long range shooters(at start of season a lot of people speculated on full court shooting). 7. Smart defense is the way to slow down best scorers. It was done effectively by a few teams from the webcasts that i watched. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
You and I must have been watching different Ultimate Ascents.
Last edited by Sean Raia : 03-03-2013 at 00:16. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
A lead gained in autonomous can stay permanently through the match.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
So true. Mid-Game scoring can not be relied upon as much as it could in Rebound Rumble (meaning, I feel that defense is somehow more effective in this game). If you are going to pull ahead in a match it had better be early on in Auton, or at the end with high climbs.
Last edited by Sean Raia : 03-03-2013 at 00:23. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
I'd also note how huge of an impact 610's drive team had for them. They were spinning past defenders every trip, and had an awesome technique that used the defender's own pyramid to get free (they'd get them stuck up against the diagonal all the time, it was very fun to watch). First Nick Lawrence, now this driver, plus the always great driving from 1114 and 2056... I guess great drivers come from Ontario. ![]() |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we learned from week 1
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|