|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
California Rankings
As of Week 2, there are 94 California teams that have competed. I used the FiM ranking calculation and applied it to California teams.
I hope to do this each week. Because teams compete in different number of events, I plan to include both the team's highest event and their average number of points. At this point, no CA team has competed in more then one event, so it's not necessary. I'm including any team from CA, even if they compete in event(s) outside CA. Here's the scoring system, from the FiM Rules Supplement Code:
POINT CATEGORY POINTS POINTS Win-Loss Record in Qualifying Rounds Win 2 Tie 1 Final Alliance Captains After Picking #1 Alliance Captain 16 #2 Alliance Captain 15 #3 Alliance Captain down to #8 Alliance Captain 14 down to 9 Draft Order by Acceptance #1 Draft Pick (Accepted) 16 #2 Draft Pick (Accepted) 15 #3Draft Pick down to #16 Draft Pick 14 down to 1 Elimination Round Performance Winning Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 30 Second Pick 24 Finalist Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 20 Second Pick 16 Semi Finalist Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 10 Second Pick 8 Awards Industrial Design 5 Quality 5 Excellence in Engineering 5 Innovation in Control 5 Creativity 5 Entrepreneurship 5 Team Spirit 2 Gracious Professionalism 2 Imagery 2 Highest Rookie Seed 2 Industrial Safety 2 Judges Award 2 Rookie Inspiration 2 Code:
Rank Team Points 1 1678 68 2 254 61 3 840 59 4 2485 57 5 3501 56 6 3970 54 7 2984 52 8 295 51 9 1538 48 10 399 45 11 3476 42 12 973 41 12 701 41 12 589 41 15 1323 39 16 670 36 17 1138 34 18 1458 33 19 2643 31 19 4322 31 21 4583 30 22 1967 29 22 192 29 24 1671 28 25 4014 27 26 1159 26 27 294 25 27 1422 25 27 4159 25 30 649 24 31 599 23 31 3303 23 33 3495 22 33 4135 22 35 2827 21 35 3669 21 37 2496 20 38 3256 19 38 841 19 38 2543 19 38 4139 19 42 2339 18 42 3925 18 44 2493 16 44 3255 16 46 2135 13 46 4486 13 48 812 12 48 1266 12 48 2102 12 48 3041 12 48 4543 12 48 4695 12 54 1700 11 55 1280 10 55 1622 10 55 1197 10 55 2085 10 55 2813 10 55 3189 10 55 3250 10 55 3486 10 55 3647 10 55 3965 10 55 4619 10 55 4738 10 67 675 8 67 702 8 67 980 8 67 1515 8 67 1572 8 67 2029 8 67 2193 8 67 2761 8 67 3021 8 67 3341 8 67 3408 8 67 3704 8 67 3849 8 67 3952 8 67 4616 8 82 1160 6 82 2658 6 82 2839 6 82 3453 6 82 3749 6 82 4160 6 82 4161 6 82 4711 6 90 581 4 90 1661 4 90 3128 4 90 3967 4 90 4785 4 Last edited by Joe Ross : 11-03-2013 at 21:29. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
This is cool stuff. Though I've looked at it in the past, I'm not too familiar with the FiM scoring system. Is there no point value associated with RCA, EI, and RAS?
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Nope. Those awards send the team to MSC, but without the robot (unless the robot qualifies too, which often happens).
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I think that was the case in the first year of districts, but at this point District Chairman's award teams compete at states with their robot, regardless of other points. Engineering Inspiration and Rookie All Star at district level don't automatically qualify a team for states with their robot, but only district winners are eligible to win the state level award.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
This is really cool, thanks for putting this together Joe! I'm excited to see 1678 in the #1 spot, they've come a long way and have a bright future ahead of them!
Also, I haven't seen this mentioned on CD, but California FIRST is posting a California Top 20 after each week of regionals. You can check it out here. These rankings are poll-based, but kind of fun nonetheless. Getting pumped for the week 4 CA events! -Mike |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Well dang this is cool. Helps me see what it would be like if California changed to FiC. It's also interesting comparing the opinion polls posted by Mike Corsetto with the FiM rankings.
Big thumbs up for this! |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Quote:
![]() Coming next year or the year after, I don't recall off the top of my head. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Not next year.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Ok. I didn't make it to the meeting that was held so I just got the cliff notes.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
It would be FiNC, and FiSC. (Southern and Nothern)
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I'm not so sure they'd split California, I've imagined the whole state would be lumped with Nevada and Hawaii.
And when CA gets the district model do you imagine the championships would be held at Silicon Valley or somewhere else? |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I don't believe the plan involves NV or HI right now, at least as FIRST sees it. I know the Hawaii teams want to be able to play here (and the Nevada teams too I'm sure). The teams in our area seemed to support making that happen, but HQ did not seem too keen on that plan.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Looking forward to the day when district points are interchangeable from region to region (you go where ever you want to and the points you accumulate add up regardless).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|