|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
California Rankings
As of Week 2, there are 94 California teams that have competed. I used the FiM ranking calculation and applied it to California teams.
I hope to do this each week. Because teams compete in different number of events, I plan to include both the team's highest event and their average number of points. At this point, no CA team has competed in more then one event, so it's not necessary. I'm including any team from CA, even if they compete in event(s) outside CA. Here's the scoring system, from the FiM Rules Supplement Code:
POINT CATEGORY POINTS POINTS Win-Loss Record in Qualifying Rounds Win 2 Tie 1 Final Alliance Captains After Picking #1 Alliance Captain 16 #2 Alliance Captain 15 #3 Alliance Captain down to #8 Alliance Captain 14 down to 9 Draft Order by Acceptance #1 Draft Pick (Accepted) 16 #2 Draft Pick (Accepted) 15 #3Draft Pick down to #16 Draft Pick 14 down to 1 Elimination Round Performance Winning Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 30 Second Pick 24 Finalist Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 20 Second Pick 16 Semi Finalist Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 10 Second Pick 8 Awards Industrial Design 5 Quality 5 Excellence in Engineering 5 Innovation in Control 5 Creativity 5 Entrepreneurship 5 Team Spirit 2 Gracious Professionalism 2 Imagery 2 Highest Rookie Seed 2 Industrial Safety 2 Judges Award 2 Rookie Inspiration 2 Code:
Rank Team Points
1 1678 68
2 254 61
3 840 59
4 2485 57
5 3501 56
6 3970 54
7 2984 52
8 295 51
9 1538 48
10 399 45
11 3476 42
12 973 41
12 701 41
12 589 41
15 1323 39
16 670 36
17 1138 34
18 1458 33
19 2643 31
19 4322 31
21 4583 30
22 1967 29
22 192 29
24 1671 28
25 4014 27
26 1159 26
27 294 25
27 1422 25
27 4159 25
30 649 24
31 599 23
31 3303 23
33 3495 22
33 4135 22
35 2827 21
35 3669 21
37 2496 20
38 3256 19
38 841 19
38 2543 19
38 4139 19
42 2339 18
42 3925 18
44 2493 16
44 3255 16
46 2135 13
46 4486 13
48 812 12
48 1266 12
48 2102 12
48 3041 12
48 4543 12
48 4695 12
54 1700 11
55 1280 10
55 1622 10
55 1197 10
55 2085 10
55 2813 10
55 3189 10
55 3250 10
55 3486 10
55 3647 10
55 3965 10
55 4619 10
55 4738 10
67 675 8
67 702 8
67 980 8
67 1515 8
67 1572 8
67 2029 8
67 2193 8
67 2761 8
67 3021 8
67 3341 8
67 3408 8
67 3704 8
67 3849 8
67 3952 8
67 4616 8
82 1160 6
82 2658 6
82 2839 6
82 3453 6
82 3749 6
82 4160 6
82 4161 6
82 4711 6
90 581 4
90 1661 4
90 3128 4
90 3967 4
90 4785 4
Last edited by Joe Ross : 11-03-2013 at 21:29. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
This is cool stuff. Though I've looked at it in the past, I'm not too familiar with the FiM scoring system. Is there no point value associated with RCA, EI, and RAS?
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Nope. Those awards send the team to MSC, but without the robot (unless the robot qualifies too, which often happens).
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I think that was the case in the first year of districts, but at this point District Chairman's award teams compete at states with their robot, regardless of other points. Engineering Inspiration and Rookie All Star at district level don't automatically qualify a team for states with their robot, but only district winners are eligible to win the state level award.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
This is really cool, thanks for putting this together Joe! I'm excited to see 1678 in the #1 spot, they've come a long way and have a bright future ahead of them!
Also, I haven't seen this mentioned on CD, but California FIRST is posting a California Top 20 after each week of regionals. You can check it out here. These rankings are poll-based, but kind of fun nonetheless. Getting pumped for the week 4 CA events! -Mike |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Well dang this is cool. Helps me see what it would be like if California changed to FiC. It's also interesting comparing the opinion polls posted by Mike Corsetto with the FiM rankings.
Big thumbs up for this! |
|
#8
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I considered adding in points for those awards, but ultimately decided not to, so that the results can be compared to FiM/MAR.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
There are those who feel very strongly that assigning some sort of point value to these awards, particularly the Chairman's Award, would go against everything FIRST stands for. To say that the Chairman's Award is equivalent to X matches won defeats the intent of the award.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Quote:
![]() Coming next year or the year after, I don't recall off the top of my head. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Not next year.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
It would be FiNC, and FiSC. (Southern and Nothern)
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
Ok. I didn't make it to the meeting that was held so I just got the cliff notes.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I'm not so sure they'd split California, I've imagined the whole state would be lumped with Nevada and Hawaii.
And when CA gets the district model do you imagine the championships would be held at Silicon Valley or somewhere else? |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: California Rankings
I don't believe the plan involves NV or HI right now, at least as FIRST sees it. I know the Hawaii teams want to be able to play here (and the Nevada teams too I'm sure). The teams in our area seemed to support making that happen, but HQ did not seem too keen on that plan.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|