|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Through week 6, 203 teams have played 1048 matches in the state of Michigan. We are down to the final 64 teams, roughly the top 30%. In the 4-year history of the Michigan State Championship, Michigan has produced 6 Einstein Finalists and regularly provides about 25% of the FRC Championship’s Divisional Eliminations teams. Of the 16 finalist captains and first picks in the 4 years of the Michigan State Championship, 9 have been at least Divisional Finalists. Success at MSC matters and it’s an indicator of good things to come.
What's at stake here? Unlike the regionals that take place around the country, the district competitions do not qualify anyone to championship. Currently, 6 FiM teams are qualified for championship. 67 and 51 are HoF teams, 27 won the EI award at Northern Lights, 245 won the Palmetto Regional, 2834 won at Buckeye, and 288 won the EI award at the Western Canadian Regional. 27 spots remain for 59 other teams to fight for, and every team wants one of those spots. MSC has proven to be the strongest event outside of the CMP and IRI. The average scores are off the charts and the depth is unparalleled. 37 teams have previous OPRs over 40, with half of those (18) over 50. Losing scores over 100 will be the norm and we may see the greatest collection of 200-point matches at one event outside of IRI. With strategy developing and evolving through each week, Ultimate Ascent has turned into a sport of positions. Some positions are obvious (the full court shooters and the climbers), while others are more obscure. Only a few teams have been able to consistently score the colored discs, worth 5 points apiece, from the ground. Even the most elite of the colored disc scorers, 2145 with their 4-disc toss, may not make a big splash at MSC, though each of those teams is capable scoring in other ways. Below are rankings of which teams seem to be the best at each of the most common “positions” in the game. The Full Court Shooters An effective full court shooter (FCS) can light up the scoreboard whether they score in the 2pt or 3pt goal. FCSs have seen the most success during qualifying rounds, when opposing alliances typically do not defend them effectively. They pose a huge threat in elims if they’re allowed to shoot unopposed. These robots fall under this specialty.
The 50-point Climbers and Dumpers The hardest single task in this year's game is climbing the pyramid. The list of capable teams is small, but grows each week as teams finally get everything going. The biggest addition to these robots is the 20pt dump into the top of the pyramid, achieving the 50pt play. These robots have shown the ability to get those 50 points, a potential match-clincher.
The Pickups Floor loading may have been the most overlooked part of the game this year. The opportunity to add 24 extra points in auton is a huge boost, a great advantage right out of the gate, in both qualifying and elimination matches. Teams with pickups can also employ the “Ground and Pound” strategy, where they clean up the misses made by runners and FCSs.
The Cyclers One thing Michigan is not short on is talented and speedy cyclers. Nearly every robot at MSC has the ability to receive discs from the feeder stations and score in the high goal, but some teams have the elite speed and maneuvering capability to get around the best defense. With so many cycling robots, the few we’ve listed here are the cream of the crop.
How it's all going to go down Ranking teams is all well and good, but it’s difficult to predict how the game will evolve and play out at the Michigan State Championship. With the number of full-court shooters, tall defenders will be in high demand and potentially short supply, as that role was typically taken by the 3rd robots in district eliminations. Even when they’re able to take their long shots, winning matches will be difficult for the less accurate full-court shooters, unless they have a pickup robot on their alliance. Pure cyclers may have trouble as well. Though they’ve been able to outclass most of their opponents so far, there are a large number of talented cycling robots at MSC. Captains could look for an additional ability, whether it’s an extra-disc autonomous mode or high climbing. Pickups could have the best time at MSC. To start, there really aren’t very many available. Every alliance will want to get extra discs in auton. Robots that can pick up are a near-necessary partner for an FCS, but they can complement any other robot type well. Two pickups on the same alliance could overmatch an opposing FCS by cleaning up their misses or starve an opposing pickup making them one-dimensional. Versatility will be valuable to avoid being predictable. For that reason, it’s most likely that the Michigan State Champions will be some combination of the three strongest and most versatile teams: 33, 67, and 469. The Killer Bees not only have the best auton and would complement an FCS perfectly, but they can also score independently and effectively. Las Guerrillas may not have the best auton or the best FCS, but their ability to pick up from the floor, shoot in cycles, or shoot full-court will confound opposing alliances. Finally, HOT will run the best FCS at the event and has added a 50-point climb and dump to top it off. Any two of these robots could decisively take the Michigan State Championship. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Great analysis!!!
So, Mr. Informer, any chance you'd like to meet for coffee, say, this Saturday morning? Oh yeah, if you happen to have a picklist handy by then, maybe bring that along?? Just a peek???? ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
For the 50 point climber/dumpers, you forgot 4294, StarTREC out of Lansing. At both Troy and Bedford they climbed and dumped successfully in nearly every match (only missing one in each, if that many). So I would actually rank them higher than every other climber/dumper since (from what I've seen) they're more consistent than any of the teams you mentioned.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Oh I didn't even know that (obviously). That's disappointing, they're a great group of people.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
You had me up to the conclusion.
While I think a pairing between 33/67/469 would indeed be a very strong alliance, I don't feel the powerhouse teams are as dominant as they were last season. Meanwhile, there are several versatile teams on the west side, like 1918 and 2054, that are very strong this year that could make great partners in a winning alliance. I wouldn't rule out an upset, but that's just my .02$ Last edited by DjScribbles : 10-04-2013 at 11:21. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Quote:
DjScribbles, you are right on the versatile teams part, 33, 67 and 469, have become the most versatile teams and bring different things to the table. If together, it's unlikely they may be stopped. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
I'm curious to see how this compares to LF's post, as it is well thought out and in depth. Thank's for educating me on some of the lesser known Michigan teams to look out for.
|
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Quote:
Great post btw - thanks for the info |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
CA winners are the only teams that get to bring their robots to MSC to compete that don't make it with points.
EI and RAS only get to be interviewed on Saturday if their robot didn't make it via the point system. -Clinton- |
|
#12
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
From the Championship registration list today, it looks like 288 has not registered yet from their qualification this weekend but 217 has, from the waitlist I assume since they didn't attend last year.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Quote:
217 qualified for MSC because they are ranked 32nd in the state. You can see the full rankings here: http://firstinmichigan.org/FRC_2013/...13_season.html |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
I predict that the winner will not come from the #1 seeded alliance.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship
Quote:
- 2009 - 217/67/65 - #1 alliance - 2010 - 1918/469/2834 - #1 alliance - 2011 - 33/67/70 - #2 alliance - 2012 - 469/67/830 - #1 alliance If I had to make a prediction, I would say whatever alliance 469 is on, will be the winner. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|