All District FIRST?

[Ivan Malik]

FiM requires 2 volunteers per event from each team

[dodar]

Originally Posted by Ivan Malik

FiM requires 2 volunteers per event from each team

Really? What happens if you have a small team and cannot give up 2 people to volunteer?

[Zebra_Fact_Man]

Originally Posted by dodar

Really? What happens if you have a small team and cannot give up 2 people to volunteer?

It doesn't have to be at an event you're competing at.

For instance, this year I volunteered at a district my team usually competes at that we didn't go to.

[Conor Ryan]

Originally Posted by Zebra_Fact_Man

1) I believe FiM already does this.

2) Yes, I agree.

Awesome! Those are surprises I love to hear! Hopefully it'll be used in more places in the future, 2 volunteers per team is a good place to start. More key volunteers are what is really needed, and that can't be provided on demand really.

Originally Posted by PVCpirate

You're a big fan of the extra cost? Yes, we like the regionals, but I think many teams would beg to differ here. If I was in charge of a team and you told me I could pay $5000 for a flashy regional, 9 matches and one shot at eliminations, or pay $5000 for 2 events in high school/college gyms, 24 matches and 2 shots at eliminations, I'd pick the latter in a heartbeat. Money aside, as a student, I would have loved to be able to attend one, let alone 2 regular season events with 40 or less teams, something I've never done. The spectacle isn't everything.

1) Playing matches isn't everything either, especially for the teams that had a rough year with the robot they put on the field.

Playing is not always what inspires everyone, sometimes its the theatrics and production around everything that makes it awe inspiring. The best solution is probably to find a more cost-effective way to bring the theatrics to the district model. I feel overall there was too much of a compromise on cost.

2) If you want to get more funding, the show part really is great for going after money. I've seen prospective sponsors turn into actual sponsors much faster at a Regional than a District. It adds to the awe and gives the whole organization a much more professional face. In particular its helpful for raising funding at the event level, regionals wouldn't cost so much if the events were able to fundraise for themselves better.

I guess the best way to summarize my complaint with the current district model/format/presentation is that it lost too much of the professionalism associated with a regional in order to cut costs of events.

[DampRobot]

Could someone please explain the Super Regional idea? I've heard the term before, I'm just not exactly sure what it is or how qualifying would work.

Also, I highly recommend reading that FiM FAQ whitepaper. It actually got me excited about California moving to district competition in the near future!

[Kims Robot]

Originally Posted by DampRobot

Could someone please explain the Super Regional idea? I've heard the term before, I'm just not exactly sure what it is or how qualifying would work.

Also, I highly recommend reading that FiM FAQ whitepaper. It actually got me excited about California moving to district competition in the near future!

The Super Regional is the next step between District Championships and Worlds. Basically when the entire country/world has transitioned to Districts, the concept is there will once again be too many teams for the World Championship, and that they will need another layer of qualification to finally make it to worlds. So a team would potentially play 2 Local District Events, District Championship, Super Regional and World Championship (or 5 events!) in order to win Worlds. FIRST mentions that it is very very very far off in the future, and they aren't even sure if the concept is needed or fully fleshed out.... but its a potential.

And I agree, the whitepaper is incredibly helpful and just like we always say "Read the Manual", anyone who wants to discuss districts should read that white paper, NE's proposal (maybe updated soon?), and the FiM rules supplement.

[BJC]

Originally Posted by Gregor

Doesn't matter to the teams, it still costs $17 000.

Actually, it does matter -- A LOT. The fact that FiM attempts to make the MSC a free event each year is important. As more areas enter the district system and this argument is voiced by more and more people it will eventually happen. Yes it costs $5000 now, but it will probably be free within 5 years.

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan

Awesome! Those are surprises I love to hear! Hopefully it'll be used in more places in the future, 2 volunteers per team is a good place to start. More key volunteers are what is really needed, and that can't be provided on demand really.



1) Playing matches isn't everything either, especially for the teams that had a rough year with the robot they put on the field.

Playing is not always what inspires everyone, sometimes its the theatrics and production around everything that makes it awe inspiring. The best solution is probably to find a more cost-effective way to bring the theatrics to the district model. I feel overall there was too much of a compromise on cost.

2) If you want to get more funding, the show part really is great for going after money. I've seen prospective sponsors turn into actual sponsors much faster at a Regional than a District. It adds to the awe and gives the whole organization a much more professional face. In particular its helpful for raising funding at the event level, regionals wouldn't cost so much if the events were able to fundraise for themselves better.

I guess the best way to summarize my complaint with the current district model/format/presentation is that it lost too much of the professionalism associated with a regional in order to cut costs of events.

You have a fundamentally different mindset from Fim. FiM is all about getting more playing time for your money and minimizing cost so that the sport can expand. No, not every event is as fancy as a regional, but that's the point. The big show is the championship which is hallmarked by high quality in both event production and robot competitiveness.

In FiM playing matches is everything. For all the hundereds of hours put into each robot many (most) robots went to a single regional this year and competed for a grand total of 1,215 seconds (20.25 minutes). FiM promises twice the playing time allowing that team that had a rough first competiton, instead of being finished with their season, another shot to improve and compete. This difference can not be understated and is a large part of the reason why Michigan teams are so competitive compaired to other areas of the world.

In regards to aquiring funding individual districts don't have their own funding. This is umbrella'd by FiM who I don't believe has ever had trouble aquiring sponsors.

I'm not telling you to agree with me, just asking you to understand the realities of the growing sport and the steps FiM has taken to allow an increasing amount of teams to compete more for less.
Regards, Bryan

[PVCpirate]

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan

1) Playing matches isn't everything either, especially for the teams that had a rough year with the robot they put on the field.

Playing is not always what inspires everyone, sometimes its the theatrics and production around everything that makes it awe inspiring. The best solution is probably to find a more cost-effective way to bring the theatrics to the district model. I feel overall there was too much of a compromise on cost.

2) If you want to get more funding, the show part really is great for going after money. I've seen prospective sponsors turn into actual sponsors much faster at a Regional than a District. It adds to the awe and gives the whole organization a much more professional face. In particular its helpful for raising funding at the event level, regionals wouldn't cost so much if the events were able to fundraise for themselves better.

I guess the best way to summarize my complaint with the current district model/format/presentation is that it lost too much of the professionalism associated with a regional in order to cut costs of events.

To your first point, I would say that the second event is a game changer. For a team who usually goes to 1 regional, if they can't get their robot figured out by Friday *POOF* there goes the whole season. If the same team is in a district model, sure, the first district event may go the way of the regional. However, they now have a window of time to work in their own shop to improve the bot for their second event, and hopefully have a good performance, maybe even qualifying for their District championship. I think that is much more inspiring than having a robot that never does what it was meant to do and then going home.

That being said, I think I understand your point better now, and it makes a lot of sense, especially how it relates to sponsors and funding. I think with time, the district system will improve as more areas adopt it and FIRST HQ continues to support it, and will start to get back more of the professionalism you're talking about. After this season, we'll have a combined 7 years experience in the system between FiM and MAR, so the new ones won't be starting from scratch.

[Zebra_Fact_Man]

Originally Posted by PVCpirate

To your first point, I would say that the second event is a game changer. For a team who usually goes to 1 regional, if they can't get their robot figured out by Friday *POOF* there goes the whole season. If the same team is in a district model, sure, the first district event may go the way of the regional. However, they now have a window of time to work in their own shop to improve the bot for their second event, and hopefully have a good performance, maybe even qualifying for their District championship. I think that is much more inspiring than having a robot that never does what it was meant to do and then going home...

I would like to see the statistic on the number of teams who didn't participate in the elimination rounds during their 1st district but still made it to the State Championship, over the past few seasons. I can't think of any off of the top of my head. As the # of teams increase, and the # of St. champ. spots being static, it becomes increasingly difficult to make it to the big(ger) dance, almost to the point where a bad 1st district puts achieving states out of reach [yes mathematically still possible since 75(theoretical max pts per district) > 57(FiM cutoff this year) but I've never seen a team perform a 45+pt district improvement].

Even without qualifying for states, having the ability to improve and be competitive IS a game changer for weaker teams that turns an abysmal season into an inspiring season.

[Brandon_L]

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan

Awesome! Those are surprises I love to hear! Hopefully it'll be used in more places in the future, 2 volunteers per team is a good place to start. More key volunteers are what is really needed, and that can't be provided on demand really.



1) Playing matches isn't everything either, especially for the teams that had a rough year with the robot they put on the field.

2) If you want to get more funding, the show part really is great for going after money. I've seen prospective sponsors turn into actual sponsors much faster at a Regional than a District. It adds to the awe and gives the whole organization a much more professional face. In particular its helpful for raising funding at the event level, regionals wouldn't cost so much if the events were able to fundraise for themselves better.

I guess the best way to summarize my complaint with the current district model/format/presentation is that it lost too much of the professionalism associated with a regional in order to cut costs of events.

As a one regional team before MAR due to a serious lack of funding, and barely scraping entry each year, I can attest that the number of matches and events for my money is more important than the "snazz" of an event - thats what the regional champs are for. I can see it not making a huge difference to more fortunate teams.

I believe seeing the robot the students put together for the last 1008 hours of their lives succeed is greater than a good sound system and light show in terms of inspiration.

Perfect example, TCNJ this year was a pure disaster for us. Couldn't get the robot running whatsoever. We used the time while eliminations were going on to figure out what was wrong and come up with a game plan for our next district, which, we won.

With our team being in such a high density area getting sponsors is pretty tough, I'd rather pay 4k for 24 matches at 2 events then play 8 matches with a boston regional setup for the same amount.


NOTE: Wheres everyone getting this 17k figure from? Districts+MAR CMP+CMP=13k, I'm assuming its the same for Michigan.
EDIT: I think I was missing the "super regional" step

[PayneTrain]

^One thing Brandon didn't come right out and say, but I'm sure he thinks is important, is that more teams get recognition for their hard work at the district level than at the regional level.

When 2495 won the Lenape District in Week 4, they earned the same kind of blue banner anyone in any regional would have earned if they won their tournament. Sure, the team did not win MAR Champs, but they won a blue banner. Whether it's a district or a regional, winning an event is no easy feat in the tournament or in the Chairman's room, and their accomplishment was recognized.

There are a lot of really good teams in really dense, strong areas of robot country that may have limitations in funding because they are not providing winning results. I imagine that winning a district is a provides a morale boost for team members and supporters as well as attracts potential sponsors for a team trying to make itself as tough as the established powerhouses.

[Akash Rastogi]

Originally Posted by Brandon_L

As a one regional team before MAR due to a serious lack of funding, and barely scraping entry each year, I can attest that the number of matches and events for my money is more important than the "snazz" of an event - thats what the regional champs are for. I can see it not making a huge difference to more fortunate teams.

I believe seeing the robot the students put together for the last 1008 hours of their lives succeed is greater than a good sound system and light show in terms of inspiration.

Perfect example, TCNJ this year was a pure disaster for us. Couldn't get the robot running whatsoever. We used the time while eliminations were going on to figure out what was wrong and come up with a game plan for our next district, which, we won.

With our team being in such a high density area getting sponsors is pretty tough, I'd rather pay 4k for 24 matches at 2 events then play 8 matches with a boston regional setup for the same amount.


NOTE: Wheres everyone getting this 17k figure from? Districts+MAR CMP+CMP=13k, I'm assuming its the same for Michigan.
EDIT: I think I was missing the "super regional" step

Going to completely agree with Brandon here, especially after learning from and working with 2495 this season and 3929 last season, as well as working with many underfunded MAR teams in the area.

I don't give a crap about the extras at events anymore. It is all about the the inspiration that takes place on the field for me, my students, and the potential sponsors I bring in. Qualcomm reps we brought to TCNJ didn't care at all about the venue or anything else, they cared about the robots and the kids. More matches do equal more inspiration. Fancy lights and banners don't.

Originally Posted by PayneTrain

There are a lot of really good teams in really dense, strong areas of robot country that may have limitations in funding because they are not providing winning results. I imagine that winning a district is a provides a morale boost for team members and supporters as well as attracts potential sponsors for a team trying to make itself as tough as the established powerhouses.

In addition to this, it is EXTREMELY difficult for new teams in dense areas to find the large amount of funding it would take to go to two normal regionals+travel+lodging.

Full disclosure: I freaking love the current district model in MAR. Sure it has some improvements that can be made, but I completely disagree that spending a bit more money in running them to add some random extra jazz is worth it to the teams who pay to compete in it. The atmosphere of an event is what the teams make it, not what regionals with cool lighting and banners and all used to be.

[Ian Curtis]

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan

2) If you want to get more funding, the show part really is great for going after money. I've seen prospective sponsors turn into actual sponsors much faster at a Regional than a District. It adds to the awe and gives the whole organization a much more professional face. In particular its helpful for raising funding at the event level, regionals wouldn't cost so much if the events were able to fundraise for themselves better.

I guess the best way to summarize my complaint with the current district model/format/presentation is that it lost too much of the professionalism associated with a regional in order to cut costs of events.

How is, "We'll take your $10k and spend it on fancy lights" a more compelling argument than "We'll take your $10k and expose this to hundreds of additional people"?

I understand that donors want something for their donation, but it seems like you get a lot more bang for your buck in the district model. And there will still be a state championship with the production value of a traditional regional, and the robot quality is way, way better. Are the fancy lights and AV crew worth it if the robots struggle to score a single game piece?

I lived a similar experience to Brandon. In the first two years of 1276 we had a kind of adversarial relationship with the school (teachers kept track of when we left printers on, and other fun pedantic things, and we were very thorough about cleaning up after ourselves). In 2006 we invited the principal to come to our regional, and by a happy coincidence we won. After that, we had full run of the schools tools and they paid our registration fee.

Sign me up FIRSTWA.

[PVCpirate]

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan

1) I'm not entirely a fan of districts in the first place. I'm not a fan of the current district model.

I'm a big fan of the extra cost associated with a full regional, the bigger venues, professional Event Managers, professional AV staff, the professional grade radios, the overall show aspect, there are a lot more details that go into an event than just putting up a field and having tables for a pit. I know MAR is starting to learn this and has started purchasing more AV equipment, but that's not everything. If you leave a regional after working it for 4 days and you had a professional team with all the right resources, life is so much easier/less frustrating.

You're a big fan of the extra cost? Yes, we like the regionals, but I think many teams would beg to differ here. If I was in charge of a team and you told me I could pay $5000 for a flashy regional, 9 matches and one shot at eliminations, or pay $5000 for 2 events in high school/college gyms, 24 matches and 2 shots at eliminations, I'd pick the latter in a heartbeat. Money aside, as a student, I would have loved to be able to attend one, let alone 2 regular season events with 40 or less teams, something I've never done. The spectacle isn't everything.

5) The super regional idea is the coolest thing in FRC's future.
It is starting to resemble the other March Madness...

By today's prices, a complete season(making it to World's) in a district system would cost $17,000 in registration alone. Even if the prices go down, the cost of travel could reach thousands per student on many teams. We need to be lowering the entry barrier into FRC, not raising it.

[Ivan Malik]

Originally Posted by PVCpirate

By today's prices, a complete season(making it to World's) in a district system would cost $17,000 in registration alone. Even if the prices go down, the cost of travel could reach thousands per student on many teams. We need to be lowering the entry barrier into FRC, not raising it.

This is a FIRST HQ thing. Check out Jim Zondag's white paper. FiM wants states to be free.