Go to Post No matter what the weight limit is, a large number of teams will *ALWAYS* have trouble making it. - Cory [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 00:36
Ingar Ingar is offline
Hardware Lead
AKA: Navid Mokhlesi
FRC #0649 (M-SET Fish)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: California
Posts: 9
Ingar is an unknown quantity at this point
Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

I am curious as to how other teams deal with the inconsistencies in box tubing width when making a West Coast Drive. Since the snap ring groves must be CADed exactly in place it is not very tolerant of the variations in the box tubing's width.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 00:48
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

download the cad in my sig.

our bearing block design isn't affected by tubing thickness.

for other designs, extra length must be added to handle the tolerance stackup.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-07-2013, 18:30
Brandon_L Brandon_L is offline
The color orange triggers me
AKA: Brandon Liatys
FRC #2180 (Zero Gravity)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 1,191
Brandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
download the cad in my sig.

our bearing block design isn't affected by tubing thickness.

for other designs, extra length must be added to handle the tolerance stackup.
I've been playing with those blocks, and just wondering how the ones in the slots are kept in place. Do they just float in the middle somewhere held by chain tension? That seems really weird. I don't see how you lock them down in your CAD.

EDIT: Now that I look at it, its only 3/8ths of wiggle. So it might not be as big as an issue as I think.
__________________
FRC 2495 - Hamilton West Robotics [2007-2014]
FRC 3929 - Atomic Dragons [2012-2013]
FRC 2180 - Zero Gravity [2017-]

Just trying to collect all the possible team colors

Last edited by Brandon_L : 08-07-2013 at 18:39.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-07-2013, 20:48
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon_L View Post
I've been playing with those blocks, and just wondering how the ones in the slots are kept in place. Do they just float in the middle somewhere held by chain tension? That seems really weird. I don't see how you lock them down in your CAD.

EDIT: Now that I look at it, its only 3/8ths of wiggle. So it might not be as big as an issue as I think.
When the blocks are loose, a chain tensioner pulls them against a fully taught chain.

This position is locked in when the faceplates are tightened.

If a WCD drive bearing block doesn't clamp the frame, it will not work well. This rigidity is key
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-07-2013, 22:16
Brandon_L Brandon_L is offline
The color orange triggers me
AKA: Brandon Liatys
FRC #2180 (Zero Gravity)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 1,191
Brandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon_L has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
When the blocks are loose, a chain tensioner pulls them against a fully taught chain.

This position is locked in when the faceplates are tightened.

If a WCD drive bearing block doesn't clamp the frame, it will not work well. This rigidity is key
Im not entirely sure what you mean by the first bit. But it sounds like you'd have them loose when you're putting the chains in and slide them around to get your tension, then tighten them down. Your first sentence made it sound like there is another tensioner somewhere, though.
__________________
FRC 2495 - Hamilton West Robotics [2007-2014]
FRC 3929 - Atomic Dragons [2012-2013]
FRC 2180 - Zero Gravity [2017-]

Just trying to collect all the possible team colors
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-07-2013, 22:24
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 519
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon_L View Post
Im not entirely sure what you mean by the first bit. But it sounds like you'd have them loose when you're putting the chains in and slide them around to get your tension, then tighten them down. Your first sentence made it sound like there is another tensioner somewhere, though.
This other tensioner is most often a cam mounted inside the tubing that can be rotated to adjust the position of the bearing block along the length of the slot, and thereby properly tension the chain when the bearing blocks are loose. Then the bearing blocks are tightened in place to help maintain their position until they need to be adjusted again.
__________________
[2016-present] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-07-2013, 22:37
craigboez's Avatar
craigboez craigboez is offline
Mechanical Engineer
AKA: Craig Boezwinkle
FRC #2811 (StormBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 217
craigboez is just really nicecraigboez is just really nicecraigboez is just really nicecraigboez is just really nicecraigboez is just really nice
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

If memory serves, the tensioners are missing from some of 973's CAD files. Download the most recent one from Hurricane and you'll see the tensioners.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 00:49
Travis Covington's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Travis Covington Travis Covington is offline
Engineering Mentor
FRC #0254
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 573
Travis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Travis Covington
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

You need to accommodate manufacturing tolerances in all of the parts involved (both extruded tubing, as well as any parts you make yourself). As such, lengthening the shaft some to accommodate tubing width variations, as well as bearing housing manufacturing tolerances is necessary and not really a big deal. This is pretty common. If you want to get really picky, you can add precision shims later to make up for the difference, but again, this is rarely ever worth the effort. Making things "line to line" never works well in the real world as you have already figured out.
__________________
-Travis Covington

2008-2017 - Engineering Mentor of Team 254
2001-2008 - Engineering Mentor of Team 968
1998-2001 - Mechanical Director/Driver/Member of Team 115
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 01:23
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

For a more thorough answer, we also have to account for tolerance stackup... we just have one less item to add. this really isn't a huge difference.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 02:35
DampRobot's Avatar
DampRobot DampRobot is offline
Physics Major
AKA: Roger Romani
FRC #0100 (The Wildhats) and FRC#971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Stanford University
Posts: 1,277
DampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

The most I've seen box tubing run over in the 2" dimension is around .003", and about .002" for the 1" dimension. (Inside dimensions are another story.) That's pretty high precision, I doubt most students could get similar precision on a manual lathe between two of those snap ring grooves.

While the box tubing per se is fairly high tolerance, once you start adding in other parts on the shaft, the tolerances really do start to stack up. As Travis said, line to line with something like snap ring grooves tends not to work very well. Instead, it's a good idea to add in a bit of wiggle room in the form of a small adder on the groove-groove dimension.

If you don't need to do two snap ring grooves, my team's used a slightly different solution which soaks up tolerances on the shaft stackup quite well. We put one snap ring on the shaft (this year, it was on the inside) and on the other end of the shaft, we tap a 10-32 hole. A screw in this hole with a few washers retains the wheel, and nicely soaks up any inaccuracies in the box tubing, bearing blocks, etc.
__________________
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be lighted.

-Plutarch
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 13:34
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 519
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Quite honestly, until you're chasing after the last few available percentage points of efficiency in your drive system, tolerances down to the 3rd decimal place digits are ridiculous to make a fuss about. Precision to the hundredths of an inch or order of 0.005" at best would a more realistic goal for most teams when aiming to line up their snap ring grooves and drive components. It's better to have things exact, but at the same time it is not entirely critical to the drive system working.

While tolerances do stack up, adding on a 0.003" MAXIMUM variation (based on what I have seen and heard from others) is not going to have a profound influence when you aim to line up components over the length of your robot to within 0.020". If that 0.003" is the last straw, then you have another 0.017" somewhere in your system that you likely have more control over and would be more easily addressed. Go for the lowest hanging fruit first, then work toward a more elegant and optimized solution later as you chase excellence.
__________________
[2016-present] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 20:33
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,507
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

We typically guestimate to account for powder coat thickness, then add another 5 thou planned allowance (slop), then add another 20 thou or so per side with the anticipation of using a shimming washer between sprocket and bearing and between wheel and bearing. Also, it won't hurt anything if there's a little extra space between the grooves. If you want to get it just perfect, you can custom machine spacers to exact length to go between the wheels and bearings.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 22:04
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is online now
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,602
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Easiest way we have found to account for this in our shaft design without having to think about it at all in advance is to use a snap ring on one side, and a screw + washer on the other (the wheel side).
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-06-2013, 22:44
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

We've seen deviation of +/-.005" easy on tubing, possibly more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Easiest way we have found to account for this in our shaft design without having to think about it at all in advance is to use a snap ring on one side, and a screw + washer on the other (the wheel side).
The issue with this is it will compress the bearings and add friction. The bolt will also loosen over time.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-06-2013, 01:07
T^2 T^2 is offline
Registered User
FRC #5499
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 216
T^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond reputeT^2 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
The issue with this is it will compress the bearings and add friction. The bolt will also loosen over time.
Would a wave spring rectify this issue?
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi