|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
FIRST seems to be evolving to look like a lot of things in life, to the point where I can introduce a metaphor that will elicit groans and confusion, but will satisfy me and maybe a few others.
The James River runs through Richmond, VA and some of the topography of the land allows for a number of "watering hole" public parks to spring up and thrive around it. One of the most popular is Belle Isle. It offers a varietry of activities from walking trails to laying out in the sun all the way up to jumping between the rapids and of the dam and jumping off of the very high-hanging pedestrian bridge into the water below. FRC is becoming like the island. With the smaller dimensions and the kind of game available to play, in addition to the growing district system allows for teams of all shapes, sizes, interests, and goals to get as much out of the program as possible. The game this year allowed for average teams to compete at a high level if they wanted to, as evidenced by results at a lot of events. Still, the best teams were able to dive into the real beauty and complexity of this year's task: the dimensions were so small, a lot of teams simplified, but the best teams packed as much power as they usually do in the smaller footprint. The objectives in the competition were so starkly different and presented such unique challenges, average teams committed to building great, simple mechanisms while powerhouses could manage to pull off both challenges with elegance. With districts, teams can elect what mountain they wish to climb. If they are just in it for the matches at the qualifier level, so be it. If they want to make the big stage, they can push themselves mechanically, financially, and strategically to reach a goal far more attainable than a lucky draw in to CMP at the average regional event. I also think FTC will grow at a rate faster than FRC as HQ and the global board of directors (in addition to local boards) are not identifying FTC as merely feeders or intermediaries, but programs primarily designed to positively affect the students involved. FRC is clearly transitioning to not only being about the team, but acting as an agent of change, which is a trend that will likely continue. FTC programs will catch on at the middle school level more, and FTC will have a bigger presence at CMP in the future. I hope and expect FIRST to continue building the positive trends that are already established this season. |
|
#33
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
Quote:
|
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
In terms of FRC...
1. A more global league. How bout more teams from Mexico, Canada, South America, and more in Asia and Europe where we can see different robots based on different technologies around the world. 2. More opportunities to qualify for CMP. Louisiana is in an area that makes it hard to travel to more than 1 regional. Most are 5,6,7+ hours away, and the past few years, bayou reg. has been dominated by teams from florida and texas. I would like to see a district in the southeast, or another regional in louisiana, mississippi, alabama, or north florida. 3. KOP options. Some rookie & 2nd year teams need a structured KOP, but older expirienced teams could use vouchers, or a more "advanced" version. 4. More profesionally built bots. I want to see exciting robots that make us say WOW!! My team has been a part of some zero to zero matches, & it is not a fun expirience for a young team working their butts off. 5. Notoriety. Period. The students, mentors, volunteers, and sponsors of FIRST deserve to be given the recognition they have worked for, because this is how young people make the world a better place. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
Quote:
Then you're right, FIRST needs to make it much clearer that these teams are to be emulated. (As well as teams like 33, 469 and other non HoF teams) This constant bashing of highly successful teams (on the field and off it) sickens me and FIRST, frankly, FIRST needs to come out and be Frank (heh) and say that teams are free to use whatever resources they can find. Or, you know, whatever the heck they want to come out and say. Just stand by something and freaking yell it every kickoff and put it in the manual. We need to fix this "well, we TRIED but [XYZ Team] had those [expletive] engineers down at NASA build their robot for them" attitude. Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|