Go to Post Thinking should never be against the rules of FIRST - Richard Wallace [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > Robot Showcase
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 02:51
BurkeHalderman's Avatar
BurkeHalderman BurkeHalderman is offline
Casual Robot Observer
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 95
BurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant future
WCD CAD Practice



I've been contemplating a West Coast Drive for a while now. And just recently a CNC mill, CNC lathe and a plasma cutter came into our team's possession, so we're no longer limited to sheet metal. I've used the WCD SS Shifter and bearing blocks from WCproducts. Current specs are:
Dimensions - 28"x27.5"
Weight - 28.9lbs
High gear - 16fps
Low gear - 6fps
Belt driven using 24t GT2 profile pulleys
4" AM performance wheels
Bearing Blocks slide 1/2" to adjust tension, and use CAM tensioners.

My concern at the moment is that the pulley walls will bend during use and allow the belts to slide out of alignment. The reason i say this is that the pulleys are made from pulley stock and two 1/16" walls. These walls are not directly attached to the pulley stock and are held in place with a spacer an retaining ring as shown:
http://i.imgur.com/cFGnGK1.jpg

Any thoughts anyone?
__________________
[2010-2014]: FRC 3266 Robots-R-Us: Founder and Alumni
2010 (5-5-1): Buckeye Regional; Driver
2011 (4-5-0): Buckeye Regional; CORI; CAGE Match; Drivetrain/Manipulator Operator
2012 (7-13-0): Buckeye Regional; Queen City Regional; CAGE Match; BPRC; Drivetrain Operator
2013 (25-15-1): Queen City Regional; Buckeye Regional; Crossroads Regional; CORI; Ohio State Champs; CAGE Match; BPRC; Drivetrain Operator
2014 (21-10-0): Crossroads Regional; Queen City Regional; Designer; Mechanical/Design Mentor

Founding an FRC team as an 8th grader sure wasn't easy, but it was totally worth it.

Get in touch with me:
Personal Facebook

I believe every human has a finite number of heartbeats. I don’t intend to waste any of mine. – Neil Armstrong
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 04:19
Kyler Hagler's Avatar
Kyler Hagler Kyler Hagler is offline
Jack of all trades
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Rockwall-Heath High School
Posts: 99
Kyler Hagler has a spectacular aura aboutKyler Hagler has a spectacular aura aboutKyler Hagler has a spectacular aura about
Re: WCD CAD Practice

I'm not exactly sure but i think thats how we did our pulleys this year and how no problems with the walls bending on the pulleys. They were great and we didn't have a single complaint about them.
__________________
Kyler Hagler - 3310 Alumni/Mentor
Black Hawk Robotics Team 3310

2012 Dallas West Regional Winner
2013 Dallas Regional Winner
2014 Colorado Regional Winner
2015 Hub City Regional Winner
2016 Arkansas Regional Winner
2016 Hub City Regional Winner

Http://Team3310.com
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 06:50
R.C.'s Avatar
R.C. R.C. is offline
2017... Oooh Kill em, Swerve!
AKA: Owner, WestCoast Products
FRC #1323 (MadTown Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Madera, CA
Posts: 2,173
R.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WCD CAD Practice

You guys should be more than good.

We did 9mm pulleys. Routered the core and then used 1/32 plastic side shields. I figured aluminum in .020" or thicker would be fine.

-RC
__________________
R.C.
Owner, WestCoast Products || Twitter
MadTown Robotics Team 1323
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 10:46
Michael Corsetto's Avatar
Michael Corsetto Michael Corsetto is offline
Breathe in... Breathe out...
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 1,130
Michael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond repute
Re: WCD CAD Practice

Any teams have experience using typical WCD cams with a belt drive? We're finalizing a similar off-season WCD, and we're concerned that the increments on a typical WCD cam are too large to properly tension a belt drive. Thoughts?

-Mike
__________________
Team 1678: Citrus Circuits - Lead Technical Mentor, Drive Coach **Like Us On Facebook!**
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 12:28
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,608
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: WCD CAD Practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Corsetto View Post
Any teams have experience using typical WCD cams with a belt drive? We're finalizing a similar off-season WCD, and we're concerned that the increments on a typical WCD cam are too large to properly tension a belt drive. Thoughts?

-Mike
You don't need a tensioning system at all to use a belt drive. If anything, designing to exact center distances with a belt drive is better as it eliminates any chance of the belt run pairs being tensioned unevenly.

There's no reason that the belt pulley walls would bend, regardless of how they're attached to the assembly.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 12:58
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: WCD CAD Practice

Mike, I'd agree the click CAM tensioners are too coarse. Since the distance is so small, I bet a smooth CAM without any clicks could be used just fine, and with a much smaller ratio during rotation. This shallower CAM would be less likely to loosen from load as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
You don't need a tensioning system at all to use a belt drive. If anything, designing to exact center distances with a belt drive is better as it eliminates any chance of the belt run pairs being tensioned unevenly.

There's no reason that the belt pulley walls would bend, regardless of how they're attached to the assembly.
Exact C-C actually guarantees all the belt runs will be at uneven tension.

When you do exact C-C the belt tension is set by the c-c distance plus the sum of all your manufacturing tolerances (which includes the belt! and that can be more than a thou on drive length belts!).

Gates has a lot of great documentation out there that explains this and many other factors with their belts. It's a great read for any team who runs belts.

Last edited by AdamHeard : 06-10-2013 at 13:08.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 13:59
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,608
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: WCD CAD Practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Exact C-C actually guarantees all the belt runs will be at uneven tension.

When you do exact C-C the belt tension is set by the c-c distance plus the sum of all your manufacturing tolerances (which includes the belt! and that can be more than a thou on drive length belts!).

Gates has a lot of great documentation out there that explains this and many other factors with their belts. It's a great read for any team who runs belts.
That makes sense. I was mentally comparing my team's exact-center set up to our previous belt drive, which used plastic tensioners with a lot of adjustability. In this case, we could easily set up our drivetrain where one belt is much more tense than the other, causing ratcheting. I do think that a WCD bearing block setup, relying on a small cam that's easy to make fine adjustment with, could result in more optimal tension than our drive. I don't know how necessary that is, but I'm sure it would help with efficiency.

It's worth noting that for an exact center belt drive made from a single piece of tubing, the spacing tolerance is just determined by how precise your mill is. For many teams this precision is really "good enough" and better than they could get with a tensioning system.

Gates's documentation on belts is very useful, and something that should be read by anyone designing a belt drive, but at times the guide's advice and specs are quite conservative. The Gates manual recommends never using an exact-center belt drive, but for FRC drivetrain purposes (at *most* a few hundred hours run time on a well used practice robot) the factors they cite that suggest a tensioning system don't really apply.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 14:06
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,494
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: WCD CAD Practice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Gates's documentation on belts is very useful, and something that should be read by anyone designing a belt drive, but at times the guide's advice and specs are quite conservative. The Gates manual recommends never using an exact-center belt drive, but for FRC drivetrain purposes (at *most* a few hundred hours run time on a well used practice robot) the factors they cite that suggest a tensioning system don't really apply.
From what I remember from the documentation isn't that they say you should never do it, but rather if you do it you should recognize you must apply a strength derating to the belt to compensate for you not having perfect tension. In reality for all FRC applications this derating should exist as even with tensioners teams aren't able to measure tension to the levels required to determine it's proper.

I only make the point for teams that are looking at a pulley setup that is right at the ragged edge. Doing exact c-c in that case will be more likely to fail than a tensioner (if the tensioner is used to really dial in tension right).

I'd rather move away from the ragged edge and just skip the tensioner, less stuff to work on.

Separately, you do raise the correct point that most of their documentation is tailored for continuous operation in factories, etc. and as such is a fair bit conservative.

Last edited by AdamHeard : 06-10-2013 at 14:09.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2013, 22:33
BurkeHalderman's Avatar
BurkeHalderman BurkeHalderman is offline
Casual Robot Observer
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 95
BurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant futureBurkeHalderman has a brilliant future
Re: WCD CAD Practice



Based on the comments so far, which have been extremely helpful, I've made some changes. I got rid of the CAM tensioners and sliding bearing blocks. It's now a C-C +.005". I've also re-done the bellypan, added a battery holder and added a more universal hole pattern on the frame. As shown it weighs 28lbs.
__________________
[2010-2014]: FRC 3266 Robots-R-Us: Founder and Alumni
2010 (5-5-1): Buckeye Regional; Driver
2011 (4-5-0): Buckeye Regional; CORI; CAGE Match; Drivetrain/Manipulator Operator
2012 (7-13-0): Buckeye Regional; Queen City Regional; CAGE Match; BPRC; Drivetrain Operator
2013 (25-15-1): Queen City Regional; Buckeye Regional; Crossroads Regional; CORI; Ohio State Champs; CAGE Match; BPRC; Drivetrain Operator
2014 (21-10-0): Crossroads Regional; Queen City Regional; Designer; Mechanical/Design Mentor

Founding an FRC team as an 8th grader sure wasn't easy, but it was totally worth it.

Get in touch with me:
Personal Facebook

I believe every human has a finite number of heartbeats. I don’t intend to waste any of mine. – Neil Armstrong
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi