|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Posted on the FRC Blog, 11/7/13: http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...80%93More-Info
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
54 regionals x 6 qualifiers per regional = 324 unique slots.
32(FiM) + 18(MAR) + 24(NE) + 24(PNW) = 98 324 + 98 = 422 They are really banking on 22 slots being double dipped. 22 seems like a lot to hope they get taken twice. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
DD + teams unable to go to CMP for whatever reason
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Quote:
16, 20, 45, 51, 67, 103, 111, 126, 148, 151, 175, 190, 191, 236, 254, 341, 359, 365, 610, 842, 1114, 1241, 1538, and 3478. I would wager 80% of these teams earn a spot this year, so that's 19 of 22 solved right there. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
There's also the 27 pre-qualified teams, 24 of which are already registered for CMP. But plenty of qualified teams cannot or opt not to attend championship each year.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Isn't there also the wildcard system to keep in mind for regionals? That would make it even closer to having 422 teams going to champs.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Quote:
Great Job Frank, thanks for always explaining the reasoning behind the decisions. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Quote:
For example, when 254 and 987 won SD last year, no wildcards were generated. When 254 later won San Jose, wildcards were generated. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
They will still pull from a wait list if there is one. I predict at least 22 teams will not be able to attend Worlds due to logistical or financial reasons
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Helpful update... thanks Frank & Co!
Glad they're going with a proportional allocation... definitely the logical and fair way to go. I also like that the teams that qualified for CMP before the start of season to be in addition to the calculated proportional allocation. It mentions in the point system document under awards that the DCMP Chairmans', EI, and RAS winners auto-qualify to CMP. It doesn't mention if DCMP Winners also get an auto-qualify to CMP. Also doesn't mention how many Chairmans', EI, and RAS winners there are... I believe at MSC last year there were 3, 1, and 1 (respectively). Does anyone know more about if this element will be "regulated" or if regions are going to have to decide for themselves? Last edited by Nathan Streeter : 07-11-2013 at 14:41. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
It's pretty reliable to say that around 85% of all offered slots for CMP will be accepted, based on recent history (last couple of years), so you will likely see at least 25+ teams move off the waitlist.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
I only listed the teams that are already registered for champs.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blogged - Standard District Points Ranking System – More Info
Hope this is addressed soon. Pretty disappointing to those on the outside looking in.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|