|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Sorry to be that guy, but once again my answer to things like this is....
No. I really am willing to bet it's just a glitch in the system, or a mistake as they edited the previous years manual. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
I disagree, in many years previous, there has been something to do with the number 3, it is likely there will be something on the field having to do with the number 3
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
It's funny to see this whole thing with the number 3 again this year. I'm sure others remember last year's red herring and game hint and their focus on the number 3. I wouldn't read too much into errors like this.
Also, this video from Team 1902 is feeling more relevant than ever these days, particularly the ending: http://youtu.be/uQ_mdx8_6A4. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
Whoa. There's another three! I like your idea better! World Champions sounds good. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
You might be better off naming your robot....... Tim.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
1994-1998: three robots per match and the amount of sides fields had were multiples of three 1996: three ways to score 1997: Triangular pyramid goal with three pegs extending from three edges 1999: Floppies 8 or more ft. high are 3 points and robot on the puck multiplies their end score by three 2002: Three zones and three goals 2004: Beginning of three team alliances I'm pretty sure it's safe to say there is an overwhelmingly high chance all future games will have some sort of three involved, whether it alliances or scoring... |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Also worth noting is the contents of the section being "edited" three times. This edit concerns the value of climb points at the FIRST Championship, which did not change. This 3-tiered challenge, with 3 edits indicating a lack of change to this challenge at the Championship, leads one to believe that a three tiered endgame will be returning in 2014, worth 10, 20, or 30 points. Perhaps it will even be a form of climbing again.
Also worth thinking about is the presentation of these "3"s in the form of errors. The 3 in the year of an earlier blog post was a typo. These three edits concern a section of the manual that doesn't exist yet in the 2014 manual (the entire Game section is empty until Kickoff). Perhaps this has some significance. The number 3 alone means nothing (indeed, I've made the same argument you're all making in the last thread), but this potential clue does seem to give more context. Or we are all obsessing over coincidental glitches. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
If we weren't, this wouldn't be CD!
Also, noticing that the official FIRST twitter has been posting pictures of previous years' games. That could compound on the "climbing... again!" theory. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
You forgot 2003 ooh, nvm found it. Ok, now I'm just being silly. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Sorry, gotta call you on that one. 3-team alliances were in play in 2002 for sure, maybe in 2000 (2001 was a 5-team alliance). But only in eliminations (play 2, sit 1).
3-team alliances in regular play wasn't until Triple Play in 2005. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
Further indication that 3 will be radically important. ![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: is this another game hint?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|