|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
So our team's planning on using pneumatics to launch the ball, but as others have noted, there's not enough flow rate. So, what we do is lock down the cylinder, open the solenoid valve which fills a small tank, then unlock the cylinder. However, the team is convinced it's illegal, but I can't really find any rules saying you can't. Has anybody else done this before?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
so long as you don't use multiple solenoids you look ok to me. the rule your team mates are talking about refers back to previous years that prohibits long runs of tubing to gain extra air storage.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
It looks like R78 says you can't.
If pneumatic COMPONENTS are used, the following items are required as part of the pneumatic circuit and must be used in accordance with this section, as illustrated in Figure 4-15. The drawing has the tank before the solenoid. IF the rule says it must be done EXACTLY like this picture then I don't think it is legal. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
The following is a schematic of the pneumatic system we used in 2012 for our catapult. It was, of course, completely legal and did have storage tanks on the low-pressure side of the system.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...9&d=1330055105 We did use a valve between the storage tanks and the cylinder, so the implementation you're suggesting is a little bit different. I can't speak to the legality of impeding the motion of a cylinder mechanically, though there doesn't appear to be any rule prohibiting that at a quick glance. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Quote:
Figure 4-17 shows a low pressure accumulator. A little heavier, but unquestionably legal: Use a cylinder with a longer stroke than is required & don't retract it fully. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Lets take this by the rules:
R74: Pass, parts are legal R75: Pass, tanks are rated for 125+PSI R76: Pass, parts are unaltered R77: Pass, parts are legal R78: Pass, this rule lists the parts of a pneumatic circuit, but not in any specific order R79: N/A not a compressor R80: N/A not a compressor R81: Pass, not operating above 120PSI R82: Pass, beyond the primary regulator, and working at or below 60PSI R83: Pass, though white-listed to be useable in 120PSI, not specifically required to be there R84: N/A not a pressure gauge R85: N/A always on-board R86: Pass operating at 60PSI or less R87: N/A not a relief valve R88: N/A not a pressure switch R89: N/A not a vent plug R90: Pass, operating on a single solenoid No blue boxes are applicable either. So, since this passes all applicable rules related to pneumatic, I say it IS legal |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Consider alternative ways of 'assisting' your cylinder's extension with, say, latex tubing.
EDIT: If you place a storage tank after a solenoid valve, will THE one Pressure Vent Plug reliably vent all stored pneumatic pressure from the system when the release valve is opened? If not, R89 will be violated. Last edited by DonRotolo : 08-01-2014 at 22:59. Reason: R89 rules! |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Quote:
) violate this rule. The valves have a neutral position, which means that unless the solenoid is active, the pressure from both sides is dead-headed. This is different behavior from the KoP valves from several years ago. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
It's our opinion that as the rules are written, an accumulator downstream of the solenoid valve is legal. If a QA answer rules this out, it is legal to connect multiple cylinders to a single valve. Just pick one with the internal volume of the tank you want, and plug one of the ports. Viola, instant accumulator. Not as weight efficient as a tank, but performs the same function.
Or, as someone else mentioned, pick a cylinder with a large internal volume and only plan to use half (or less) of the stroke. (This is actually the most weight efficient solution of all.) |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
R89
The pressure vent plug must be: A. connected to the pneumatic circuit such that, when manually operated, it will vent to the atmosphere to relieve all stored pressure, and B. placed on the ROBOT so that it is visible and easily accessible. If the compressor is not used on the ROBOT, then an additional pressure vent plug must be connected to the high-pressure portion of the pneumatic circuit off-board the ROBOT with the compressor (see R79). Air pressure in a storage tank is "stored" in the rule above. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
So using the accumulator as described is OK as long as the vent valve will release its pressure?
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
I have to ask the OP to be sure...
OP, You are using a valve to charge a tank and operate a cylinder in the same circuit? Is that what I am reading? Madison, In looking at your drawing, I do not see how the stored pressure can be vented immediately by opening the manually operated valve. Should there be a failure in either of the regulators, opening the valve leaves high pressure air still in the tanks. While that may have passed inspection at your events in 2012, I do not think it was legal in 2012 or now. Please ask the question of the Q&A. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Quote:
-Madison |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Placing a Tank after a solenoid valve
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|