Go to Post Warning: This thread is long like a Ken Leung post........... but about 47 times less interesting and insightful. - Brandon Martus [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-01-2014, 11:32
pntbll1313's Avatar
pntbll1313 pntbll1313 is offline
2052 Coach, Build/Electrical Mentor
AKA: Pete
FRC #2052 (KnightKrawler)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: New Brighton, MN
Posts: 253
pntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud ofpntbll1313 has much to be proud of
Applying the JVN calculator using multiple motors and Mecanum

I'm trying to apply the JVN calculator on an 8" mecanum wheel using both a CIM and mini CIM at each wheel and I have a few questions.

1) Can you just add the stall currents together for the CIM and mini CIM and use that number as if it were 1 motor or will that not work?

2) It says that Max Tractive force is 100.3lbs which would be weight*CoF*carpet efficiency=154*.7*.93 = 100.3lb. Does this mean any more pushing force than this will be lost to slipping? (I think the answer is yes but then that leads me to question 3)

3) We had looked at direct driving the 8" wheels using the Toughbox Nanotubes with two 50 to 14 gear reductions. Is the equation for max pushing force = (CIM stall torque) * (# of CIMS) * (gear ratio 1) * (gear ratio 2) * (gear train efficiency) * (coefficient of friction) * (carpet efficiency) / (wheel size)? If so just using 1 CIM on each would yield
(21.5 in*lbs) * (4) * (50/14) * (50/14) * (0.9) * (0.7) * (0.93) / (4 in) = 160 lbs which is more than our Max Tractive force. That leads me to believe we should be gearing it higher if using 1 CIM, and gearing it much higher if we planned on using a CIM and Mini CIM together.


I'm not positive I've got all the numbers right so if someone could double check that or tell me I'm completely wrong (either way is fine) that would be a lot of help. Thanks
__________________
2016 (mentor/drive-coach)
Quarter-Finalist-Einstein, Winner-Carson Division Champs, Winner-10K Lakes, Chairman's Award-10K Lakes, Finalists-Lake Superior,
Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition

2015 (mentor/drive-coach)
Finalists-10K Lakes, Finalists-Lake Superior, Finalist-MSHL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Galileo Division Champs
2014 (mentor/drive-coach)
Winner-10K Lakes, Winner-Lake Superior Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Galileo Division Champs
2013 (mentor/drive-coach)
Winner-10K Lakes, Winner-Lake Superior, Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Newton Division Champs
2012 (mentor/drive-coach)
Finalists-Lake Superior, Semi-Finalist-MSHSL State Championship, Semi-Finalists at 10,000 Lakes
2008-2011 (college mentor)
2007 (driver)
Quarter Finalist-Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi