|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are the Semis & Finals worth playing?
Posted by Joe Johnson at 2/4/2001 7:59 PM EST
Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems. I am torn in my mind about the way the Semi-Finals and Finals are going to go. CONSTANT SCORES => REDUNDANT SEMIS & FINALS Part of my brain can see alliance scores being more or less constant from round to round. That is, an alliance that scores 520 in the first match of the Quarter-Finals will score 520 in every round they play from then on. When I think this way, I think to myself that by the time that teams get to the elimination rounds at the Nationals, only the best of the best will be there. AND all the confusion about how to maximize scoring will be resolved to a few key moves that almost everyone will understand clear. VOLITILE SCORES => SEMIS AND FINALS MUST BE PLAYED TO KNOW WHO'LL WINS The other part of my brain sees the scores in the elimination rounds as anything but constant. When I think this way, I think that all 4 teams will each have to perform everything perfect to get the alliance's highest possible score. Beyond this there is the risk factor. Because time figures into the score, teams will rush themselves and take chances in order to shave precious seconds off their time. Teams may take the ramp at higher speeds or try to balance the goals in a hurried fashion. All this leading to uncertain scores as the risks sometimes payoff and sometimes panout. One final wild card that makes the Semis and Finals more than a repeat performance is the limited availability of stretcher tickets. Think about it. Suppose an alliance gets their highest scores in the Quarter Finals by using a stretcher ticket for a particular team. The question is then when to use the second ticket? If they use it in the Semis, they may not have it when they need it in the Finals. If they don't use it, they may not make it to the Finals. BOTTOM LINE: I can see this breaking both ways, with the volatile score version being a bit more likely (I'd place the odds at 60-40) Which way do you think it will break? Do tell. Joe J. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Rigging" the game vs playing the game strategically - what's the difference? | ColleenShaver | Rules/Strategy | 13 | 15-01-2003 10:33 |
| What really would have helped in finals is....... | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 24-06-2002 03:24 |
| getting picked for finals... | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:55 |
| Many inexpensive playing fields | archiver | 1999 | 5 | 23-06-2002 22:57 |
| dead robot in the finals? | srawls | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 24-03-2002 14:44 |