|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: 10-24 vs 10-32 | |||
| 10-24 |
|
25 | 16.78% |
| 10-32 |
|
69 | 46.31% |
| 1/4-20 |
|
45 | 30.20% |
| We don't use hardware |
|
10 | 6.71% |
| Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
10-32 or 10-24?
What does your team use for structural component hardware - 10-32 or 10-24? What are the situational advantages to each? Why do you prefer one thread size to the other?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
In my experience, teams go-to hardware is almost universally 1/4-20.
Increasingly, teams are not using bolts in favour of rivets, though. Particularly those with sheet metal frames. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
10-32 is normally used for machines, 10-24 is normally used for carpentry.
We use 10-32 |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
10-32 for two reasons:
1. 10-32 is the sze of the thread to mount CIM motors 2. 10-24 and 6-32 are the most commonly broken tap sizes due to the ratio of pitch to shank diameter. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
You already gotta use a bunch of 10-32s, and 1/4"-20 is usually overkill, so it's the obvious choice. If you wanna use 10-24, have fun breaking taps.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
The mechanical leadership on my team wanted to 'standardize' on 1/4-20 this year, until I pointed out that every COTS part we buy is 10-32. So we wound up having both, but standardized the lengths.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
...and the science teacher who is helping us wants us to use metric hardware.
![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
For our team we use a mix of 10-32 10-24 and 1/4 20
Lately however the last few years we have been using slot I aluminum pop rivets Lighter save the weight |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
We tend to use 10-32 for most applications. 10-32 reduces the strength of the bolt less than 10-24 as the thread is shallower. They also loosen less easily as the thread angle is shallower.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
We have large cases full of 1/4-20 and 10-32 nuts and bolts. 1/4-20 is for mounting to the frame, 10-32 is for superstructure and mechanisms. We're gradually getting smaller in our fasteners...
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
There needs to be an option for "We have a can of assorted hardware that we pick from and hope fits."
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
Our team uses both. #10-24 is nice for speed, but sometimes #10-32 are used for things like fine grain control or needing to get as many teeth in mesh as possible. I believe this year, our chain tensioning system uses #10-32 into a helicoil for these reasons. For our drive system, we typically rivet everything since we typically use a sheet metal base. We really try to determine what the right screw is for the job.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
Up until last year, we had used 1/4-20 almost exclusively. We made the switch over last year to #10-32 and 3/16" pop rivets based on the recommendations found here on CD. I never thought we would go smaller until using the 2014 VEX chassis...we now have a large collection of #8-32 hardware. Haven't had to go any higher than 1/4" this year, which is only used with the VEX "tube axle" (seriously love the concept). Definitely use #10-32 the most...small, lightweight, everything else others have mentioned so far.
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
Both.
We transitioned away from 1/4-20 several years ago for the weight savings. 10-24 hardware is easier to find/get. 10-32s require 33% more turning to thread the same distance compared to a 10-24. We use 10-32 when we interface with COTS items that use that pitch. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 10-32 or 10-24?
10-32. All the things others mentioned, plus you can tap them into thinner material and still get the required six threads of engagement.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|