|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
huh. seventy six pounds. I guess we need to go on a high carb diet
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
We've probably seen about forty linear feet of Vex hex shaft and hundreds of their hex bearings. Literally none of them didn't fit on the shaft properly the first time around, no filing or nothin.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
MOE is unable to find one either, we may need to get one keyed with a mill, is switching to hex an option for you? |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
We're currently at about 85lbs. Much better than we've done in previous years
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
Being 1747 alumni, I see some things never change (minus 2010). Look at some pictures of your 2007 robot (whose name escapes me). To call that robot cheeseholed would be an understatement. It was (from what I was told at the time) accidentally made from 1/8" wall 1" square tubing (not 1/16") and even cheeseholing the frame, (if I remember right) they had to cut the tubing into angle irons to make weight. Even one frame section as cut and replaced by a carbon fiber member... More seriously, I agree with the list... specifically the hex shaft. Usually AL is a better material than steel for hex shafts. The lone exception was the shooter shaft in Seagriffin (the 2009 robot). Being the student machinist who made the 2nd and 3rd shafts, that one had some gnarly vibrations with aluminum that steel seemed to fix. But otherwise, AL hex seems to be strong enough (although in the past, a bit less than precise when being used for pressed hubs). |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Our 2nd year, 2012, our robot came in, 3 days before ship day, at 150 lbs....to this day I have no idea how we shed 30 pounds without sacrificing any major systems at all.
This year we are set to come in right under 90 lbs! ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Weighed in on Sunday out of curiosity (it is my first year as a coach) and we only weighed 87lbs. A few more parts to add but should finish under.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
The math I did for our robot put us at around 140lbs. So we spent a whole day planning out how we would cut weight. A little over half way through the day we decided to actually weigh the robot. The scale said the robot weighed 93 lbs. Now I thought the scale had to be way off because my math is never wrong. So the my best explanation was that the weight loss fairy had come over night and taken 47 lbs off our robot. So I think 4607 is the biggest loser so far this season. Then again my math could have been wrong. But I did the math on that and the odds were that my math was right. (Obviously meant to be funny pleased don't take anything I said seriously)
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Our CAD said the robot would weigh something like 1000lbs. But this was including a ball and bumpers that were both solid aluminum
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
I'll never forget weighing in at 137 lbs 4 days before ship day in 2006.
We ended up chopping the top half of our robot which was a nightmare, trying to redo all the functions with a different design. I bought car scales soon afterwards and we weigh as we build since then. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 FRC's Biggest Loser
Quote:
Is still a metric ton. I don't see the difference. /sarcasm/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|