Go to Post I don't think FIRST is the reason for following rules, being respectful, etc. We should do that anyway. - Dan Zollman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-02-2014, 23:16
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Electrical/Programming Mentor
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,753
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

I was just going through the latest round on the Q&A, and saw this:
Quote:
Q. R87 Would pneumatic tubing be considered a "legal fitting" for the purposes of satisfying R87?

A. No.
https://frc-qa.usfirst.org/Question/365/showquestion

And for those who need it,
Quote:
R87. The relief valve must be attached directly to the compressor or attached by legal fittings connected to the compressor output port. If using an off-board compressor, an additional relief valve must be included on the ROBOT.
I believe this is different from what we saw last year, and something teams should probably be aware of. If I had to guess, they determined that connecting it through tubing is a safety issue, as it's much easier to block tubing (by getting pinched, for example... think of a garden hose with a kink in it) than it is to block a brass T fitting connected straight to the compressor.

Cue the over-hyped outrage we've seen from other Q&A rulings so far this year...
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA

Last edited by Jon Stratis : 19-02-2014 at 23:19.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-02-2014, 23:24
Thad House Thad House is offline
Volunteer, WPILib Contributor
no team (Waiting for 2021)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Thousand Oaks, California
Posts: 1,094
Thad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond reputeThad House has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

LRI's at Portland last year said it had to be that way as well. So that was the ruling last year too. We specifically made sure to make ours already compliant like this.
__________________
All statements made are my own and not the feelings of any of my affiliated teams.
Teams 1510 and 2898 - Student 2010-2012
Team 4488 - Mentor 2013-2016
Co-developer of RobotDotNet, a .NET port of the WPILib.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-02-2014, 23:50
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

If I had to guess, I'd say it's an oversight rather than a deliberate safety-oriented ruling (presuming that tubing was considered a fitting last year—I don't remember the specifics). But the ruling is nevertheless clearly stated and enforceable.

Accidentally deadheading the compressor isn't such a terrible thing. Certainly the compressor will stall, but in all likelihood the thermal cutoff or the circuit breaker will trip before the pressure exceeds the structural limits of the compressor or even the pinched tube. In the event that the electrical safety features don't operate, that tube will probably be first to fail (uneventfully), but if not, a compressor seal will probably fail before any structural component.

If it was an intentional decision, perhaps they're concerned about the overheating (especially Viair) compressors softening plastic tubing attached to the compressor head. But if so, the safety issue should be dealt with under R8, because it applies to any tubing running in the vicinity, not just the tubing attached to the relief valve.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-02-2014, 00:30
Steven Smith Steven Smith is offline
Registered User
FRC #3005 (RoboChargers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 215
Steven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Smith has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

I'm not sure if I follow the logic that because other components would fail first, the ruling does not relate to safety.

Regardless of whether the tubing or the tanks would fail first, the sole purpose of including a safety relief valve is to ensure that the entire system stays below the rated working pressure of the components. Connecting the safety relief to the system with flexible tubing that could potentially be kinked by a robot mechanism or any other number of things would render the safety relief worthless, therefore the rule is that it must be connected with rigid fittings.

Seems pretty cut and dry to me?
__________________
2013 - 2017 - Mentor - Robochargers 3005
2014 - 2017 - Mentor - FLL 5817 / 7913
2013 - Day I Die - Robot Fanatic
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-02-2014, 00:39
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Smith View Post
I'm not sure if I follow the logic that because other components would fail first, the ruling does not relate to safety.

Regardless of whether the tubing or the tanks would fail first, the sole purpose of including a safety relief valve is to ensure that the entire system stays below the rated working pressure of the components. Connecting the safety relief to the system with flexible tubing that could potentially be kinked by a robot mechanism or any other number of things would render the safety relief worthless, therefore the rule is that it must be connected with rigid fittings.

Seems pretty cut and dry to me?
The confusion may lie in my first sentence: I don't think the ruling was necessarily a deliberate attempt to increase safety (even if concerns rules that are clearly safety-oriented). For example, it could be a deliberate attempt to increase reliability, while keeping safety essentially the same.

I don't think it was addressing safety because the additional hazard caused by a tube failure or kink between the compressor and relief valve is minimal, and is adequately managed by the other safety features and regulations.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-02-2014, 00:45
AllenGregoryIV's Avatar
AllenGregoryIV AllenGregoryIV is offline
Engineering Coach
AKA: Allen "JAG" Gregory
FRC #3847 (Spectrum)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,551
AllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AllenGregoryIV
Re: Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

This is a rule change from last year (actually from earlier this year) and it was intentional on HQ's part for safety reasons.

Our bagged robot is illegal since this rule was not changed until now. We'll be figuring out a way to change it in Dallas.
__________________

Team 647 | Cyber Wolf Corps | Alumni | 2003-2006 | Shoemaker HS
Team 2587 | DiscoBots | Mentor | 2008-2011 | Rice University / Houston Food Bank
Team 3847 | Spectrum | Coach | 2012-20... | St Agnes Academy
LRI | Alamo Regional | 2014-20...
"Competition has been shown to be useful up to a certain point and no further, but cooperation, which is the thing we must strive for today, begins where competition leaves off." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-02-2014, 23:37
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Q&A 365 - important pneumatic ruling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2014 Game Manual
R87. The relief valve must be attached directly to the compressor or attached by legal fittings connected to the compressor output port. If using an off-board compressor, an additional relief valve must be included on the ROBOT.
I believe this is different from what we saw last year, and something teams should probably be aware of. If I had to guess, they determined that connecting it through tubing is a safety issue, as it's much easier to block tubing (by getting pinched, for example... think of a garden hose with a kink in it) than it is to block a brass T fitting connected straight to the compressor.

Cue the over-hyped outrage we've seen from other Q&A rulings so far this year...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2013 Game Manual
4.1.10.12 R86
The relief valve must be attached directly to the compressor or attached by legal fittings connected to the compressor
output port. If using an off-board compressor, an additional relief valve must be included in the high pressure side of
the pneumatic circuit on the ROBOT.
Same rule as last year.

In fact I'm pretty sure this rule has been the same since they began allowing any COTS compressor besides the original Thomas one, which had two output ports (relief valve had to be attached to one of the two outputs) so the rule in its current form was not necessary.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi