|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
does anybody know the current standings?
|
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
Thanks to 1114 for posting this on Facebook (as of match 35): ![]() |
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
I'm not sure that FIRST realizes exactly how much things like working Twitter feeds and live streams matter to making FRC an event people want to, and will, watch.
|
|
#79
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Thanks.
In case anyone was wondering what happened to us after that match, a robot smashed into us and slipped out our left drive chain, beat up the left drive talon and disconnected a couple of spots on our welded shooter frame. For the next three matches, we only used the rollers and could not shoot/truss/etc with the shooter. We hope that it will work a lot better tomorrow, but the damage was pretty bad. Rough game out there (the other alliance had 250 in foul points and a yellow card, in case you were curious). Really fun regional to watch, though, and teams like 3683, 4039, 4678, 1114, 254 amongst many, many others are all wonderful to interact with in the competition. And if you wanted more clarification on the overturn, the call was initially made against a team on the other alliance for damaging our elephant ear, which won us the match along with a normal foul. We didn't feel it was right, so we mentioned it to the referee when the other alliance began protesting. Winning is great and all, but it felt pretty crappy to win like that. Only thing I can think of right now, though, is the damage we took. It'll really hurt our scores, record and scouting data for other teams. Last edited by Yipyapper : 21-03-2014 at 16:34. Reason: Grammar. |
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
The problem is that the FMS isn't set up in a way that lets FIRST modify it to fix problems easily. The field issues with inconsistent hot goal timing and pedestal delays are still causing multiple replays at each day at each competition for 5 weeks now. The fact that they can't figure out how to fix it in this amount of time is very telling. |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
Historically, Waterloo hasn't had any issues of this nature from what I can recall. I wonder if something changed in the FMS for 2014 that's broken updating at *some* events. |
|
#82
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
|
#83
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
|
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
It must be the server side, because I am uploading match archives via FTP from the same network connection.
|
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
4039 is dirty. Really nice driving.
|
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
Anybody know if the field in Waterloo is the same field that was at GTRW? Perhaps there is a setting off on the field server? |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
4039 has been performing consistently well today. They definitely are a top 5 bot at Waterloo. Looking at their robot, I'm curious if they were inspired by past 2056 style design methods, or if they have any relation to OP.
|
|
#88
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Their drive train is a bit weaker than I would like, but they've got shooting down.
They need to get with a team that has a strong drive train and good drivers that can run picks for them. But if they hold on to that #1 spot in the rankings, that won't be a problem. |
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Racer26 : 21-03-2014 at 17:27. |
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2014 Waterloo Regional
That would be one tricky pick list. The possibility of having to choose to play any one of 254/1114, 2056/1114 or 254/2056 as a consequence, before even thinking about 1241/1285/3683/4678/etc.
With so few teams but so much depth, it's ambiguous as to whether it's a case of 'impossible to get wrong' or 'impossible to get right'. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|