|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Thanks. My method didn't account for backup teams or teams replaced by backups, but they were already accounted for elsewhere.
Thanks. My method didn't accommodate someone who won Chairmans and another award at the same event. Congratulations for being too good for my algorithm. Here's a more comprehensive list, subject to the same caveats as previous. 33 68 75 78 399 503 558 624 836 1023 1108 1310 1318 1718 1817 1983 1986 2046 2175 2337 2403 2468 2471 2486 2502 2522 2590 2614 2903 2996 3238 3284 3313 3360 3467 3602 3667 3794 3824 3937 4060 4125 4488 4911 4914 4915 4956 4967 4988 5129 5188 Last edited by Joe Ross : 02-04-2014 at 02:02. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Any inclination when waitlist spots will be released??
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Following District Championships
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
4914 won RAS at their first event, then won the regional at their second, to they created a wildcard, and didn't take up 2 spots.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
One of the things that is incorrect is the count from NECMP. We have 24 allocated slots PLUS 6 slots for our legacy/hall of fame teams for a total of 30 spots from New England.
These six teams may have been accounted for somewhere else in your math but I wanted to point out they may be missing. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Quote:
HOF/Legacy teams are counted separately to your district's allocated spots at CMP. In that instance they will hold two spots, but they will not generate a wildcard for another team. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Quote:
Finally, moving on to the FIRST Championship: - 24 teams from New England will go on to the FIRST Championship. This count does not include our 6 Legacy and Hall of Fame teams (FRC 23, 126, 151, 175, 190, 236) who receive auto-bids through FIRST HQ. - The 24 will allocate automatically as follows (and was discussed in part on Frank’s Blog): 4 Chairmans Award Winners 2 Engineering Inspiration Award Winners 2 Rookie All Star Award Winners |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
The *allocated* spots do not include the additional 6, as in "24 spots are up for grabs". However, if a legacy team takes one of those 24 spots by winning the event / CA, the spot is not passed down.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
That's not the way I understood it and the way it was explained by NEFirst at our meetings before we went to the district model this year. This is all new for us so I guess we'll have to find out soon.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Correct me if I am wrong, but the specifics on the wildcard are a wildcard spot is only created when a team who wins a regional has previously qualified by winning a prior regional. I don't believe RAS, Chairmans, or EI pass on Wildcards should a team win one of these at a prior Regional and then win at another event.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
I couldn't find this in the manual, but went back and re-read the Blog post. Thanks!
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
If there are any waitlist spots open, how is it determined who gets the spot?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Teams Holding Multiple Spots For Championships
Order on the waitlist. Registration was in the fall. Teams that didn't attend the 2013 Championship get priority, but otherwise it's first come, first serve.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|