2014 Lessons Learned: The positive

[Koko Ed]

What did FIRST do particularly well this year?

[BigBen]

They had a game design that when played well felt like you were watching a sporting event.

The Championship Finals were extremely exciting and really came down to team strategies rather then one particular robot dominating the field.

[rsisk]

4 team alliances. Loved it.
More awards during division eliminations.
Inspectors emphasizing "Customer Service".

[Steven Donow]

Originally Posted by rsisk

Inspectors emphasizing "Customer Service".

Was this something new done with Championship inspections? Care to be a little more detailed?

[cadandcookies]

Transparency and community reaction time.

It was great to see Frank/HQ react to controversial events in the community quickly and professionally.

[EricH]

The game itself--as a game--was a good game. Lots of action, lots of excitement, lots of score swings.
The reaction to "Not enough refs to handle the game" in Week 1 was pretty good, just wish it had been sooner, like before Week 1.
Frank (and HQ) being open and responsive when stuff came up, 'nuff said.

[rsisk]

Originally Posted by Steven Donow

Was this something new done with Championship inspections? Care to be a little more detailed?

During our initial meeting with Al, and later reiterated by the division LRI, we were encouraged to keep the inspection experience for the team a positive one. This happened at CMP, can't speak for the regionals and districts.

[cadandcookies]

Also loved the Einstein webcast. Like, it was almost TV quality stuff. Really made the game accessible and understandable. Just need a few people to work on their speeches

[Chief Hedgehog]

This game was designed for Eliminations/Championships. My family was glued to the screen throughout the day.

I have 4 young children (ages 7 and less) and we watched the action throughout the day today. Our dinner was interrupted by the second finals match (and it was Sloppy-Joe night!) - my 2 year old daughter left her plate and then went back about 45 minutes later to finish...

I loved Ultimate Ascent - but as a person that has coached a number of sports, Aerial Assist was a great game. I know that there were issues (BELIEVE ME - I KNOW!) but the game when it was played with great alliances was awesome. Anytime you can get 2, 6, and 7 year olds screaming along with a couple of 30-somethings, it was a great game.

[Chief Hedgehog]

Originally Posted by cadandcookies

Also loved the Einstein webcast. Like, it was almost TV quality stuff. Really made the game accessible and understandable. Just need a few people to work on their speeches

Without a doubt - the sportscaster presence explaining the game was great. FRC did an incredible job. I will add that the camera work was great as well.

[Mr V]

Originally Posted by Chief Hedgehog

Without a doubt - the sportscaster presence explaining the game was great. FRC did an incredible job. I will add that the camera work was great as well.

I agree the sportscaster like analysis of the match and the interviews from the sidelines were great. It made it much more like a sporting broadcast and also gave a chance for more of the great MCs to be a part of the Einstein matches.

[Ali Ahmed]

The fact that this game couldn't be "broken". Meaning, there wasn't one robot design nor strategy that would guarantee a win.

You could play the perfect strategy one match but then have it defended against the next. (Einstein F1-2, for example).

I loved how scouting was incredibly important this year. It was absolutely necessary to scout in detail. This year was about thinking, not just building and driving. It reminded me of '05.

[Maxwell777]

Originally Posted by ali_rockon22

The fact that this game couldn't be "broken". Meaning, there wasn't one robot design nor strategy that would guarantee a win.

You could play the perfect strategy one match but then have it defended against the next. (Einstein F1-2, for example).

I loved how scouting was incredibly important this year. It was absolutely necessary to scout in detail. This year was about thinking, not just building and driving. It reminded me of '05.

Totally agree. I saw so many launcher and grabber designs that worked equally well.

Also, with hindsight being 20/20, there were a few more factors we should've included in our scouting, for example, the performance of a human player can hurt a match just like a missed shot.

[Oblarg]

Single game pieces are the way forward. It was so much more rewarding seeing three robots playing a team sport rather than three robots performing a task in parallel.

[Anupam Goli]

Originally Posted by Oblarg

Single game pieces are the way forward. It was so much more rewarding seeing three robots playing a team sport rather than three robots performing a task in parallel.

In the regional season it wasn't all that great, but at the championship level it was great to see what the world's best could do and the dynamic of the alliances

I will agree though that having one game piece made the game much easier follow and definitely led to some amazing performances and strategies at these upper echelons of play. Perhaps going to 2-3 game pieces per alliance could be a good balance between a low number of pieces and not having to overly rely on alliance partners?