|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
It has four relay outputs for Spikes but I imagine you could use those to drive 8 Solenoid valves unless the rules prohibit it. There is a new Pneumatic Control Module from Cross The Road Electronics that communicates over CAN and provides support for many more valves and compressor control.
https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-30419 http://uwinfirst.com/Files/roboRIO%2...on%20Flyer.pdf |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
As Dale said, you'll probably be controlling your solenoids through the Pneumatics Control Module (PCM). It has specific ports to plug in the compressor and pressure switch, ports for solenoids, and a jumper to let you switch from 12 to 24 volts. It sits on the CAN bus, which lets you add several PCM's if you have enough solenoids to need to (in otherwords, you're no longer limited to the 16 you can currently have with 2 pneumatic modules in the cRio).
New features include native support for CAN on the RoboRio (no more serial to CAN converters), USB host and USB device support, native ports for most outputs (no need for a digital sidecar or breakout boards), and an expansion port to give you as many ports as you'll probably want. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
So, I wonder how robust will be the DSC that is now integrated into the RoboRIO? If the integrated DSC dies, do you also lose the entire RoboRIO? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
I think there was a fear that teams with less resources would struggle using industrial standards and the system was made to be similar to what is currently used. I could tell that NI wanted to introduce FIRST to more professional stuff but there was a reluctance to move to far away from the current model. Its a shame cause I was hoping FIRST would move away from the bare wire connectors like the WAGO but it looks like they are going to stay . I really wish the PD board came different options, I want one with powerpole 45s board mounted. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wasn't trying to encourage anyone to sign up to be a beta test team just to get the new hardware. I was trying to point out the fact that it's not impossible to get the new hardware before October/December, for the right reasons.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RoboRio
Does anyone remember the beta test signup link that was on the NI flyer given out at champs?
|
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: RoboRio
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RoboRio
They did talk to our head Electrical mentor, we are signed up for a full Beta testing this summer/fall. I haven't heard anymore specific details about RoboRIO, but all I know is that we get more mechanical room next year.
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RoboRio
It depends on the space your looking for. It has a larger footprint but a much lover profile giving more "vertical spacing" depending on the orientation.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
Overall it has a smaller footprint since it replaces the cRIO and DSC.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RoboRio
One of the first questions asked by the alpha teams was about electrical protection. First and NI are quite aware of what would happen if a controller was fried, and we were assured that it is far more resistant to electrical failure than the old DSC.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|