|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mecanum Wheels
I have searched and searched for some specific information on Mecanum wheels. This is not for a FIRST team, but for a class I'm taking. (If any of you are familiar with Square One, that's the program its through. To read more: http://www.squareonenetwork.org/inno...ign-challenge/ ) And we are actually doing this research and testing for our robotics team in the future. Kill two birds with one stone.
So back to the information we need: What is the suggested RPM for Mecanum wheels? What motor has had the best outcome? Which is best for motor reduction? (ex: gearbox, chain, belt, etc) Any other helpful tips about building with mecanum wheels? P.S. We are really only building a chassis to mount to the bottom of the jeep, and everything is autonomous. THANKS IN ADVANCE!! |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
RPM depends on how fast you want to go. Just do the normal calculations. You can use JVN's spreadsheet.
The simplest gearbox motor combo would be direct drive with AndyMark Nano's and CIM motors. Nano AndyMark is also a great resource for using Mecanum wheels. Call them and get direct advise. It's summer they're just sitting around ![]() http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2755 Sounds like fun, please keep us updated with your results. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
I'd probably go with VersaPlantery gearboxes and BB775 motors if you are looking for the simplest motor and gearbox combination. It's not for an FRC robot, so hopefully you don't plan to stall these motors too often. If you do then CIMs into a single speed gearbox would work as well.
Think about how you want to ensure all 4 wheels maintain contact with he ground at all times. If they don't your autonomous navigation is likely to be much harder. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
Is this driving out in the environment?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
Yes, It will be driving on asphalt.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
How smooth is the asphalt it will be drivng on? As previously mentioned, meacnum wheels from AndyMark and VexPro are designed for FRC, and the concerns about using them in an outdoor setting extend beyond tread wear. In order to function properly, all four mecanum wheels need to be in contact with the ground at all times*, and have roughly equal normal force exerted on each wheel**. Driving on uneven asphalt has the potential to cause significant issues if you don't design some sort of suspension to accomodate for it.
*or at least any time that wheel is spinning **or at least have some control method to account for uneven forces transmitted by each wheel in the situation where it's not even |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
The asphalt is like the PIT area of a nascar track.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
You really aren't giving us enough information to realistically tell you what to do. I think the simplest thing for you to do is to go for a kitbot with mecanum wheels, make a basic frame to mount these (http://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-0482.htm) and just put mecanum wheels on the output shaft or just buy one of the mecanum platforms andymark already sells.
Q: What is the suggested RPM for Mecanum wheels? A: what size wheel do you have and how fast do you want to go? Q: What motor has had the best outcome? A: Not enough information. Is this FRC specific? What limitations are you working with in your class? Most teams in FRC use 1 CIM motor per wheel but other teams have gone for 1 CIM + 1 miniCIM per wheel as well. I will withhold my opinion on the competitive outcome of mecanum based robots in FRC other than that the faster ones with better drivers are visibly better. Q: Which is best for motor reduction? (ex: gearbox, chain, belt, etc) A: Not enough information. This depends on your implementation and design. This year, on their respective tankdrives, 254 had all gear reduction, 1114 had gear+chain reduction and 67 had gear+belt reduction. Most mecanum drives I see are all gear. Q: Any other helpful tips about building with mecanum wheels? A: Excessive rigidity is bad. Uneven weight distribution is also bad. You want all wheels to have equal traction at all times. Unless the floor is flat and fairly smooth I'd avoid using mecanum wheels. What budget and manufacturing resources do you have access to and what surfaces are the bot going to be driving on? Last edited by Scott Kozutsky : 09-09-2014 at 16:22. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
Using andymark 6 inch mecanums you can gear for 20 FPS+ but beware the rollers start falling off with higher frequency as your speed increases. We geared for 15+ and had to replace a roller for every 2 hours of run time. Sometimes substantially more depending on conditions.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
I can imagine that a "barbie jeep" will be operating on something distinctly different to the industrial carpet we are used to (or smooth warehouse cement floors either). I would, without further knowledge, assume you will be driving on a road surface, like a concrete or asphalt parking lot.
As such, I will warn you that Mecanum wheels made for FRC, such as Andymark and VexPro wheels, will likely have very poor tread durability operating on the sandpaper-like ground. The durometer of the tread on the rollers is quite soft and will wear down quickly, particularly during strafing. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
At IGVC a few years ago I saw a team that built large custom mecanum wheels out of razor scooter wheels. They seemed to have a tendency to get clogged with grass. Pretty awesome nonetheless.
From an autonomous perspective, are you going to really have enough sensors to take advantage of the strafing motion? It seems like you'd need to be able to align your sensor array with your direction of travel. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
We used the nano tuff boxes with the long shafts. We put a bearing on the outboard end on the shaft so the wheels were not cantilevered. The nano box were a little slow. I would look at decreasing the reduction with different gears. We used chains on one end of the robot because of clearance issues. Otherwise chains just add weight.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mecanum Wheels
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|