|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...vent-Logistics
Quote:
Spoiler for Document:
Last edited by cgmv123 : 24-09-2014 at 19:47. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
This might sound totally insane but I wonder if teams who want to go to this and build a duplicate robot could get exempted.
Almost definitely not, but I wonder if there would be any thought put into a response to a request like that. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Ouch.
We were planning to sign up for a Week 1 event tomorrow at IE. I think we still will, and try and get more info on whether or not we are able to go to Australia. Our team is already hyped about going to Australia AND doing 3 events. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Quote:
Similarly for getting back to Hawaii for Week 5. Good luck ![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Gee, only $6000 one way? Hey it's only money right?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Well Australia is famous for those Money Growing Trees; so the trip pays for itself.
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
It's probably guarded by a poisonous man eating Koala Bear.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
I think it's great that we're finally starting to see some major competition growth outside of North America....and it's going to be pretty cool to see some of the larger teams make it to Australia....
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
The cheaper solution is to register two teams. One for Australia could only cost $5000 (as a vet team).
Better yet, order the parts delivered to Australia and do that build there as a robot-in-one-day on Thursday of competition. Then you don't have to rush back. You could even scrap it after salvaging valuable parts or donate the resulting robot for next year's pre-rookie use instead of bringing it back. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 25-09-2014 at 11:29. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Quote:
Quote:
Of course, it gets extremely interesting if you consider both "teams" earning a spot at champs - do they both compete? Could we possibly see them in different divisions and facing off against each other on Einstein? And since we're talking about a Hall Of Fame team... does the "new team" get to go after Chairman's, potentially resulting in a "double HoF"? |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Quote:
There is also already a double HoF (191 if I recall, won in 1992 and 1994). And it's possible again (HoF teams can compete 5 years or more after their induction). Edit: The new team wouldn't be eligible for rookie awards either as they would likely not meet FIRST's definition of rookie. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Ok so I saw the mockery coming a mile away. No, its not cheap. But remember FIRST does have the support of Fedex, who already supplies 1 or 2 thousand to each CMP team every year (and used to do a heck of a lot more!). I think $6000 market value is not a totally unreasonable number for FedEx, FIRST, and 359 to work out between themselves, when FedEx donates millions in robot shipping annually, and FIRST and 359 are no strangers to shipping robot crates overseas.
But I'm a member of none of these parties, so I'll stop talking. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FRC Blog - Australia Regional Event Logistics
Would it be cheaper to charter a private boat, and transport the robot and students all in one shot?
That's pretty brilliant. I don't see a reason to not allow that in this circumstance. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|