|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think 8 MINI-CIMS allowed would be a good idea? | |||
| Yes, I'ld love to see what people come up with using 8 MINI-CIMS. |
|
46 | 41.07% |
| No, I like the motor rules the way they are! |
|
66 | 58.93% |
| Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Would any one else like to see (8) MINI-CIM motors allowed so the swerves can be on par with the (6) CIM tank drives?
Looks like an 8 MINI-CIM motor swerve drive would be very close to power and weight of 6 CIM motor 6WD/8WD. POWER CIM 6 x 337 watts = 2022 watts total power MINI-CIM 8 x 230 watts = 1840 watts total power Within 10% instead of down 50%. WEIGHT CIM 6 x 2.80 lbs = 16.8 lbs MINI-CIM 8 x 2.16 lbs = 17.28 lbs Seems like the current rules favor a 6 CIM tank over a 4 CIM swerve for acceleration and top speed. I personally would like to see this somehow corrected. Maybe separating BAG motors from the MINI-CIM motors and a allowing 8 MINI-CIM motors? This could be calculated by adding the watts of all motors used with a not to exceed. Or even more simply a CIM=1 and a MINI-CIM=.66 or .75 and a maximum of 6 when added up. What's your thoughts? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|