Go to Post Drive fast...drive true...otherwise it will kind of crush you - techhelpbb [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 14 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 19:42
olapmonkey's Avatar
olapmonkey olapmonkey is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mr J
FRC #0706 (Cyberhawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 12
olapmonkey is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: The Noodle Agreement

So why not just take this concept to the next level and form a noodle treaty for the entire regional. The likely playout would have everyone doing a noodle alliance as soon as the first one was executed, so why not just make a treaty that everyone signs at the regional saying no noodles will be put in play. If a team doesn't sign, then everyone else executes automatic noodle alliances unless they are facing the non-signing team. In time...all would simply sign the treaty and noodles would have no play in the game.

I personally would like to see rule G24 repealed with regards to noodles as it would invalidate this noodle alliance silliness and let the teams focus on building awesome robots that can pick up and fling noodles to the other side in addition to stackin things
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 21:56
pabeekm's Avatar
pabeekm pabeekm is offline
Master of typos
AKA: Patricia
FRC #0900 (Zebracorns)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 120
pabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by olapmonkey View Post
So why not just take this concept to the next level and form a noodle treaty for the entire regional. The likely playout would have everyone doing a noodle alliance as soon as the first one was executed, so why not just make a treaty that everyone signs at the regional saying no noodles will be put in play. If a team doesn't sign, then everyone else executes automatic noodle alliances unless they are facing the non-signing team. In time...all would simply sign the treaty and noodles would have no play in the game.
This seems to be really unnecessary and very very unfair. Honestly, I can't imagine and don't want to see any kind of situation where teams agree to this.
Punishing teams for defending a valid and fair coopertition based strategy to artificially inflate your own poorer methods, and then rubbing this in their face by using their own better idea and then banning them from ANY possible degree of success in competition AT ALL (because yes, 40 points per match is that huge) is cruel and undeniably non gp.
It'd be like making all teams agree last year to not give the game pieces to the good high goal scorers just so low goal bots can do better; it's not their fault your strategy is poorer, don't punish them over it.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 21:58
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,600
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by pabeekm View Post
This seems to be really unnecessary and very very unfair. Honestly, I can't imagine and don't want to see any kind of situation where teams agree to this.
Punishing teams for defending a valid and fair coopertition based strategy to artificially inflate your own poorer methods, and then rubbing this in their face by using their own better idea and then banning them from ANY possible degree of success in competition AT ALL (because yes, 40 points per match is that huge) is cruel and undeniably non gp.
It'd be like making all teams agree last year to not give the game pieces to the good high goal scorers just so low goal bots can do better; it's not their fault your strategy is poorer, don't punish them over it.
You say poorer methods, I say more efficient use of time both in match and during the build season.


How about a modification of the noodle agreement: We each agree to dump 7 noodles (28 pts) and each alliance gets 3 to play with. Then you can use your noodles how you wish with your complicated mechanism you spent time during the season designing and we still both gain a large value.

The marginal value between a noodle dump and a noodle in a bin is 2 pts. I think you could make a new stack (4 pts, opportunity for bin pts) faster than you could stick a noodle in a bin no matter when it happens (noodle in bin before stack, noodle in bin while already on the stack, etc...) The goal is to increase your QS during quals. Taking TNA will increase your score by 40, and also give you opportunity to spend time scoring more and increase it even further. Other than a doublecross, I challenge you to find me a time when it is not advantageous to take the noodle agreement.

Another question for discussion: I suspect many people would say refusing to cooperate with the yellow totes would be against GP. At the same time, I've heard that coopertating with noodles is not GP. Both lead to 40 pts for both alliances. What is the difference between them?

Last edited by Grim Tuesday : 03-01-2015 at 22:06.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:10
John's Avatar
John John is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Gillespie
FRC #1153 (Roborebels)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Walpole MA
Posts: 71
John is just really niceJohn is just really niceJohn is just really niceJohn is just really niceJohn is just really nice
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Personally, I think the agreement is detrimental to the game in three ways:

1) It allows for the potential to gang up on the strongest alliance in the semifinal if the other three cooperate with each other but not the strongest one, giving them a 40 point advantage. This is a much stronger threat than in the quarters, where the numbers 7 and 8 alliances are unlikely to give up 20 points (and 40 points probably isn't even enough to knock out the number 1 alliance anyway).

2) It trivializes an interesting part of the game. Scoring the noodles in the recycling containers is perhaps the hardest engineering challenge this game provides (with respect to mechanisms, I think some of the autonomous tasks may be harder regarding control systems), and is worth at most 60 points (you can get more, but it requires the other alliance to throw their noodles across the field, which won't happen with TNA). TNA provides 40 of those points without any challenge, making building a noodle-handling mechanism much less competitive than it would be otherwise.

3) It complicates an already confusing game when trying to explain it to non-FIRST spectators. Do we want to explain (to potential sponsors or other supporters) why teams are deliberately scoring for each other? How about why, though the theme of the game is recycling, teams are choosing instead to leave the LITTER on the ground?

At low levels, points from TNA are likely to exceed points from actual robot actions. I'm not sure how the GDC envisioned this game, but I would be surprised if this was their intention.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:21
Newo's Avatar
Newo Newo is offline
Registered User
FRC #2175 (The Fighting Calculators)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: USA, Woodbury Minnesota
Posts: 3
Newo is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: The Noodle Agreement

I think that most teams will want to use the noodles for scoring in the recycling bins (or throwing if they are able to), because that gives them a more distinct advantage against other teams than TNA since it doesn't increase your opponent's score. TNA basically gives a short term strategic advantage before heralding a long-term hassle for everyone, and decreased game diversity (it removes an interesting element of the game). At that point it doesn't really do anything but make the game less fun and interesting for everyone, which really isn't in the spirit of FIRST.

At any particular regional (assuming the rules aren't changed to disallow TNA in the future) there will probably be a period staring from the beginning of qualifications in which no team will want to do the noodle agreement for fear of starting a "TNA ripple" through the entire competition. Nobody wants to be "that guy" or "that team," especially considering how much TNA goes against FIRST values and robotic design competition.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:57
pbhead pbhead is offline
Registered User
FTC #1123
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: below tin. next to bismuth.
Posts: 36
pbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nice
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newo View Post
Nobody wants to be "that guy" or "that team," especially considering how much TNA goes against FIRST values and robotic design competition.
I must strongly disagree with this sentiment.

TNA is gracious professionalism just as much as any coopertition points have been in the past. More so, because it is not explicitly stated in the rules.

More importantly, perhaps, if a noodle agreement is made, but then broken, and thus backstabbing the opposing alliance who expected the noodle agreement. Is, just that: A backstab. and very anti-GP.

I do hope that rule G24 is amended, indeed, to allow for robots specializing in noodle manipulation, but at this point, the noodle agreement is far too optimal in score vs effort to not be done. Also, if the rule is changed too late (and perhaps it already is too late), robot designs will already be fairly set, parts ordered, and such, and the 'meta' in as much as ratios of robot types. has already been affected.

Let me list the pros vs cons as I see them, as far as the 6 teams on the field during the qualifying matches will see it:

Pros-
Weight, design time, space, complexity are all saved.
A guaranteed 40 points
No risk of flying or fallen noodles interrupting stacking operations.
Time not spent worrying about noodles is more time spent completing other tacks, potentially further increasing both alliance's scores.
A way to build trust with the enemy alliance.

Cons-
2 points lost per stacked can which could have had a noodle in it.
one player feeding station is effectively inoperable for the last ~10 seconds of the match, if fed though the feeder station. ~30 seconds if tossed over the top.
Potential backstab by the enemy alliance: but very not GP and as such not expected.

Any rational team will find the pros of the noodle agreement far outweigh the cons.

Frankly. if G24 is amended to allow robot noodle manipulation, even then The noodle agreement, in as far as total point scored is superior to having a noodle manipulator on your team. Your noodle manipulator will still score you 40 points, perhaps up to 80 if it can pick up off the floor, and hold all 20 noodles for a last second shotgun burst of noodles to the enemy side of the field (improbable to say the least), but now you have to deal with noodles annoying your robots, and you have one less stack manipulator... Manipulating the noodles in this way feels very non-optimal, as far as scoring goes, compared agreeing to the noodle agreement, and having a third stacking bot.


Frankly. As the rules are written right now... the noodle agreement is kind of like Jury Nullification.

Not explicitly in the rules.
No one tells you about it.
But incredibly important for the preservation of justice... i mean. optimal game play.
__________________
Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted;
persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished;
persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.
By Order of the Author -Mark Twain
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:22
alopex_rex's Avatar
alopex_rex alopex_rex is offline
Rainbow Professionalism Dash
AKA: Scott Morton
FRC #0830 (The RatPack)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 92
alopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

I seriously hope they fix this before competitions. The points are so big, especially for early levels of competition, that would be a great benefit for any team participating. And if you know about it, then all you can do is...play along, whether you like it or not.

If it isn't fixed, I fear 2015 will be forever known as the "the noodle agreement year", where competitions were decided by teams' performance in a prisoner's dilemma unrelated to the actual game. Jumping to worst case scenarios is premature though, there's still plenty of time to work this out.

I must also add that although our team may play along with TNA if it comes to that, I could never abide conspiring to punish a team or teams for violating meta-rules we have created. That would just be wrong.
__________________
Ratpack programming lead 2013 - 2015

ἔκλαγξαν δ᾽ ἄρ᾽ ὀϊστοὶ ἐπ᾽ ὤμων χωομένοιο / αὐτοῦ κινηθέντος: ὃ δ᾽ ἤϊε νυκτὶ ἐοικώς. (Ancient Greek nerds unite!)
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:33
pabeekm's Avatar
pabeekm pabeekm is offline
Master of typos
AKA: Patricia
FRC #0900 (Zebracorns)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 120
pabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday View Post
You say poorer methods, I say more efficient use of time both in match and during the build season.


How about a modification of the noodle agreement: We each agree to dump 7 noodles (28 pts) and each alliance gets 3 to play with. Then you can use your noodles how you wish with your complicated mechanism you spent time during the season designing and we still both gain a large value.
I get what you're saying; teams in a perfect world should be rewarded for their mechanisms, but there's alot to be said for the fact that you can't retaliate against teams for wanting their own routes to success. My issue isn't with teams who want to score their own noodles, but the fact that the "agreement" in question (see post 76) involves sabbatoging teams who behave in a way that certain teams won't like but that is still gp and perfectly legal. I can see the argument for retaliating against teams who break agreements they consent to, or who refuse any degree of cooperation at all, but forcing teams into your chosen model by threatening to kick them straight out of the rankings is cruel.
Forcing every team at an event into behaving according to whatever model you think is best is just asking for trouble, because there will be teams made to suffer under it through no fault of their own. I think noodle alliances will really have to be handled on a case by case basis. Alliances deserve to be able to advocate for what works best for them in each particular situation, not be silenced into following some artificial standard imposed on them by teams who feel threatened. Using the threat of effectively kicking a team out of competition because they have their own ideas is not cool.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:36
TylerS's Avatar
TylerS TylerS is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tyler Stark
FRC #1747 (Harrison Boiler Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 64
TylerS will become famous soon enough
Re: The Noodle Agreement

They're going to solve this issue quite simply... Either by putting red or blue tape to denote what litter belongs to which alliance or by some other similar means.
__________________
Purdue University 2019 - Aerospace Engineering
2016 - Team 1747 - Design & Build Mentor
2015 - Team 303 - Coach/Build Captain
2014 - Team 303 - Build Captain
2013 - Team 303 - Driver
2012 - Team 303 - Programming Leader
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:39
Mike Bortfeldt Mike Bortfeldt is offline
Registered User
FRC #1126 (& 1511)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 119
Mike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud ofMike Bortfeldt has much to be proud of
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Another potential "fix" using red and blue noodles is to have +4 for your noodles in the opposing alliance zone and -4 for your noodles in your own zone.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:44
alopex_rex's Avatar
alopex_rex alopex_rex is offline
Rainbow Professionalism Dash
AKA: Scott Morton
FRC #0830 (The RatPack)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 92
alopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

To be realistic, nothing involving a large scale agreement between teams is going to happen. This includes any proposals for "compromise" or "treaties". The idea of all 40+ teams at a competition getting together and agreeing on a treaty, or anything, is ridiculous. If TNA stays legal, decisions about it will be made team by team, match by match. (Probably for the better...the idea that teams could get together and conspire to force teams to follow their rules, and punish those that break them, is chilling.)
__________________
Ratpack programming lead 2013 - 2015

ἔκλαγξαν δ᾽ ἄρ᾽ ὀϊστοὶ ἐπ᾽ ὤμων χωομένοιο / αὐτοῦ κινηθέντος: ὃ δ᾽ ἤϊε νυκτὶ ἐοικώς. (Ancient Greek nerds unite!)
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:50
pabeekm's Avatar
pabeekm pabeekm is offline
Master of typos
AKA: Patricia
FRC #0900 (Zebracorns)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 120
pabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond reputepabeekm has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday View Post
Another question for discussion: I suspect many people would say refusing to cooperate with the yellow totes would be against GP. At the same time, I've heard that coopertating with noodles is not GP. Both lead to 40 pts for both alliances. What is the difference between them?
Yeah, that's a huge part of the problem. Teams view what's "gp" or not largely from their own perspective. At least for me, I try to use it in the most intense circumstances, but for me and you and everyone here, that applies to different things (e.g. the example above: to me it seems very un gp, but someone with a more "anything goes" attitude might think conspiracies against particular teams across an entire regional, since they're not illegal, aren't too bad an idea if it can serve to their own benefit).
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:27
BethMo BethMo is offline
Registered User
FRC #0948 (NRG (Newport Robotics Group))
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 88
BethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to beholdBethMo is a splendid one to behold
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Deja vu...

Not many of us have been around long enough to remember, but 2003's Stack Attack had very close to the same kind of qualification scoring and the same argument. That year, instead of "don't pick up litter", it was "don't knock down stacks". The result was so much argument and ill will between teams that we thought they'd never do anything like that again.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 23:00
pbhead pbhead is offline
Registered User
FTC #1123
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: below tin. next to bismuth.
Posts: 36
pbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nicepbhead is just really nice
Re: The Noodle Agreement

Quote:
Originally Posted by BethMo View Post
Deja vu...

Not many of us have been around long enough to remember, but 2003's Stack Attack had very close to the same kind of qualification scoring and the same argument. That year, instead of "don't pick up litter", it was "don't knock down stacks". The result was so much argument and ill will between teams that we thought they'd never do anything like that again.
Yes. I remember hearing about this. It was the year before I joined, but I was told the story of, and well remembered what I believe was kind of the the very first cooperation in FIRST.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alopex_rex View Post
To be realistic, nothing involving a large scale agreement between teams is going to happen. This includes any proposals for "compromise" or "treaties". The idea of all 40+ teams at a competition getting together and agreeing on a treaty, or anything, is ridiculous. If TNA stays legal, decisions about it will be made team by team, match by match. (Probably for the better...the idea that teams could get together and conspire to force teams to follow their rules, and punish those that break them, is chilling.)
Most certainly. TNA, if not amended, will be match by match. If an alliance feels they can do better without TNA that with, that is clearly their decision, and as long as the other alliance is aware, no harm is done for that particular match.

I would suspect that for the playoffs, those top teams will be very careful in their noodle agreements, and not do anything which might be consider anti-gp... just as I have never seen those top teams not use their time out to help the other guys and win by default.
__________________
Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted;
persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished;
persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.
By Order of the Author -Mark Twain

Last edited by pbhead : 03-01-2015 at 23:05.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-01-2015, 22:29
KineticCougar KineticCougar is offline
Registered User
FRC #5250
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 7
KineticCougar is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: The Noodle Agreement

I think there needs to be a compromise within this agreement. Do you think that teams will be willing to leave 5 noodles in the litter bin? This could allow teams to move the noodles into the landfill zone if the opposing alliances are dishonest. Also, do you think most teams will be throwing their noodles into the opposing alliance zone? Tell me your thoughts please
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:02.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi