|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
I believe that's the direction my team will take. Our designs have in-frame tote manipulation, and having a four-wheel setup with omnis in front reduces the racking effects of not having a support between the front wheels that would be prevalent with four "tractionful" wheels.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
Quote:
Here is one of our videos. (Skip to 0:48) |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
All questions teams should ask before for selecting a drivetrain:
holonomic or tank drive ? what size wheels , ground clearance ? what is the desired speed and torque ? single speed or shifting gearbox ? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
Or both (octocanum). Or neither (H slide).
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
This will be the first in quite a few years that we do not use octocanum.
Nor are we using the drop-center WCD-ish drive we prototyped over the summer/fall. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
I went through the following decision process:
What technologies do we have a comfortable level of experience with? Tank - yes Mecanum - yes Shifting - yes Single speed -yes Slide/H/octanum - no Swerve - no Advantages synergistic with proposed play style? Mecanum - translation, non-rocking base of support Tank - non-rocking base of support, (arguably) lower weight Shifting - none, divided field means acceleration in short runs will be most important feature Single speed - lightness, simplicity, low cost, with so many motors available we can add power until we like the performance Since mecanum's classic disadvantages aren't a serious issue with recent upgrades from mecanum wheel makers and the lack of robot-robot defensive play (at least in my humble opinion) mecanum, with single-speed transmissions, won out for us. YRMV given different team experiences or preferences. We already have a prototype mecanum drive slapped together to get the programmers and drivers practicing! |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
My team will actually not be using our octocanum, and instead are running mecanum with a very high ground clearance (3+ inches).
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
H drive isn't holonomic? Sure, it's anisotropic, but it can go forward-reverse, left-right, spin, and any combination I can think of.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
Not if the front and rear wheels are chained together on each side.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by GeeTwo : 12-01-2015 at 08:22. Reason: addition |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
What about a 4wd with the rear wheels being traction wheels and the front ones being omnis
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
4607 has used this in the past - we call it 'Peanut Drive' as that is what our 2013 drive was. I am sure there is another name for it...
Last edited by Chief Hedgehog : 11-01-2015 at 01:41. Reason: Editing the name... |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
What were your experiences with it? Did it drive well?
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
Haven't used one myself, but I've seen them in action. They tend to pivot around the traction wheels, rather than the center of the robot as you might expect if you're used to 6WD drop-center, but otherwise they're generally smooth and nimble.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Drivetrain options
This works well, but as Eric said get used to driving it like a shopping cart. My team did this in 07 and 08 and you're guaranteed not to have a problem turning.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|