|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Are active intakes necessary to be competitive in Recycle Rush? | |||
| Yes |
|
86 | 45.99% |
| No |
|
101 | 54.01% |
| Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are active intakes necessary to be competitive in Recycle Rush?
I think a lot of people are defining "competitive" as being among the top teams.
I think that being "competitive" means being on a level that you can contribute to a Playoff Alliance significantly - a la Minimum Competitive Concept. Note that a particular design can be inferior, but the robot as a whole can still be competitive. So I don't think that this poll will be productive with different definitions floating around. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are active intakes necessary to be competitive in Recycle Rush?
I can think of many ways that a robot without an active intake could be a valuable contributor to an Einstein alliance.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|