|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
2 v 3 in Dallas
Oh my...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
You said it. They just made 3802 sit on the sidelines, and got 162 points. People are really starting to RUSH, including the elite. Lots of stacks toppling over.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
We were watching this when we all slowly noticed it. It seems kind of ungp in a way if 148 just told them not to put their bot on the field.
Edit: Apparently the third robot was making modifications. I totally don't think that this is unGP the. My wording also probably confused some people. Last edited by kmodos : 28-02-2015 at 22:22. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
It's too crowded in elims with 3 robots on the field and stacks that high. If anything, I hope this makes the GDC realize some things about this game...
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
I agree. I don't think it's GP. Even if they just sat there, or undid the upside down totes, that would be better than leaving them on the sideline.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
This doesn't have to happen at later regionals. Simple rule update: You must field all 3 robots during eliminations.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
It is un-GP, but what could they really do? I suppose they could stay in the landfill and make stacks, but not much room for it. Not 148's fault, mainly the GDC's fault.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
Please don't point fingers at or accuse teams, directly or indirectly, with incomplete information. 3802 (*and/or 2613) could be broken, or elected to not play themselves.
The GDC also can't really enforce active participation of three robots, only incentivize it. EDIT: asterisk Last edited by George Nishimura : 28-02-2015 at 19:32. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
Their third robot 3802 was working on a step can grabber and was making some modifications... I wouldn't jump to conclusions. It only makes you look bad.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
Quote:
The alliance of 148, 987, and 3802 do intend to compete with all three robots on the field as soon as 3802 is up and running. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
According to the livestream, 118's alliance's third robot was supposed to be on the field for their second quarterfinal match, but didn't make it on time.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
Looks like 3802 is coming in on this match.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
good to see full alliance
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
High Rollers 987 actually just sat this match out....Comm issues. Interesting. They're still on top, but what if that happens in finals?
Last edited by btcshields6 : 28-02-2015 at 19:48. Reason: Spelling |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
Should this thread be 1 vs 3?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|