|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Future First Championship News
From: http://www.usfirst.org/aboutus/2017-...p-announcement
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Video announcement from Don Bossi
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Why stop here? Cancel all regionals, cancel all districts, let's have 12 (or more) World Championships!
Better yet, skip the event, and crown every team a world champion! |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
2 Woodie Flowers Award winners!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Some people would say this is different.
That is one word for it. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
This just feels weird. It's not really "the" world championship anymore. If a team wins, can they say the were "the" world champions? Or are they just "the world champions among the teams in the regions close to them"?
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
"Presenting your 2017 Half-World Champions" doesn't have quite the same ring to it...
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
"One of the important things about FIRST and maybe what separates us from other sports is that we're an inclusive organization we're about not about picking a winner at the expense of others but celebrating everybody's accomplishments and success."
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Having just agonized over declining a wait list position for 2015 this excites me very much to know that I have a better shot of having my team attend championships in the future! |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
How would you feel if you went to "a" championship that didnt have 254, 1114, 148, 987, 118, 624? I would feel cheated on the experience.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
My favorite part of the Championship event is the chance to see robots and teams from around the world. This move, to my eye, seems to dilute and degrade the Championship experience instead of opening it up to more teams. I'm not sure that splitting the FIRST community in two is a good idea.
And ditto all the mentions of two world champion alliances, it was difficult enough trying to explain splitting a title three ways. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
FIRST Championship 2020 Motto: You get a championship, you get a championship, you get a championship!
Maybe FIRST is trying to slowly announce Oprah is taking over for Dean. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
By time we've booked a coach bus, hotel room and insurance the cost difference between going to St.Louis and Detroit isn't huge. Rather than spending resources on creating a 2nd champs FIRST should put those resources into lowering the cost of competing with programs like districts. Would teams really rather go to one event and "half champs" than 2 events, a intermediate champs and full champs?
Last edited by mman1506 : 09-04-2015 at 12:09. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Out of the things I have seen in this thread, most people are opposed to this change because of the competition aspect. People like competition, and they want to crown a champion.
That's great, but does that line up with FIRST's vision? I don't think so. If you need a reminder, FIRST's vision is: "To transform our culture by creating a world where science and technology are celebrated and where young people dream of becoming science and technology leaders." If that means making it more accessible to more students by making two championships, so be it. From what I've seen, FIRST really isn't very concerned with the drawbacks that this system has in regards to competition. They feel like Champs is a totally unique experience, and the more kids that go experience it, the better they fulfil their mission. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|