Top 5 robots in each state

[carpedav000]

Indiana (IMO)

1.) 1024
2.) 5188
3.) 1501
4.) 234
5.) 1741

Anyone care to challenge this?

[tindleroot]

Originally Posted by carpedav000

Anyone care to challenge this?

Let's hear your reasoning first.

[IndySam]

Originally Posted by carpedav000

Indiana (IMO)

1.) 1024
2.) 5188
3.) 1501
4.) 234
5.) 1741

Anyone care to challenge this?

234 has to be at the top of the list for Indiana and I love 1741 but there is no way you can put them above 135, 1720, 71 or 447.

[carpedav000]

Originally Posted by IndySam

234 has to be at the top of the list for Indiana and I love 1741 but there is no way you can put them above 135, 1720, 71 or 447.

Reasoning for putting them above another REALLY good HP bot is I feel like they were the best landfill bot from IN. If it were a top 10 list, 1741 would be #7

[logank013]

Originally Posted by carpedav000

Indiana (IMO)

1.) 1024
2.) 5188
3.) 1501
4.) 234
5.) 1741

Anyone care to challenge this?

I care to challenge it. 234 should be number 1 or 2. Consistent at 2+ full stacks and 135 was just right up there with us. 135 isn't even on your list but they were doing 2+ stacks as well (with 5 as max height). 5188 was almost there but they weren't as consistent. 1501 was only doing 1 and 1/2 stack so they should be around 5. 1024 was good because they were the only indiana team with good can burglars but weren't near as good as 234, 135, or 5188 at stacking. 1741 could only do 1 5 stack usually but they were good cappers. 1720 should also be mentioned on here somewhere. Best landfill bot in IN I think. My top 5 is
1/2 234 and 135
3 5188
4 1024
5 1720
6 1501
7 1741
8 5402
9. 829
10. 71

Hopefully missed no powerhouse in IN. Thanks for reading.

[Kevin Leonard]

Originally Posted by logank013

I care to challenge it. 234 should be number 1 or 2. Consistent at 2+ full stacks and 135 was just right up there with us. 135 isn't even on your list but they were doing 2+ stacks as well (with 5 as max height). 5188 was almost there but they weren't as consistent. 1501 was only doing 1 and 1/2 stack so they should be around 5. 1024 was good because they were the only indiana team with good can burglars but weren't near as good as 234, 135, or 5188 at stacking. 1741 could only do 1 5 stack usually but they were good cappers. 1720 should also be mentioned on here somewhere. Best landfill bot in IN I think. My top 5 is
1/2 234 and 135
3 5188
4 1024
5 1720
6 1501
7 1741
8 5402
9. 829
10. 71

Hopefully missed no powerhouse in IN. Thanks for reading.

1501 was hitting 2+ stacks throughout Carson.

[logank013]

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard

1501 was hitting 2+ stacks throughout Carson.

That's great. My analysis was based off state. I can scout state competition but not 8 divisions at worlds. Lol

[evanperryg]

Originally Posted by carpedav000

Indiana (IMO)
Anyone care to challenge this?

Yep.
1) 234
2) 135
3) 1720
4) 5188
5) 1501

Originally Posted by asid61

Far more dominant than usual, with an OPR of 160 at SVR (and they earned it).

"Far more dominant" you mean they singlehandedly outscored every other robot in the world on a regular basis?

1) 254
2) 1678
3) 973
4) 971
5) 1671

Here's a couple others:
Minnesota
1) 3130
2) 2512
3) 2502
4) 2052
5) 2169

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in idaho...

Missouri:
1)1730
2)1806
3)1986
4)3284
5)1723

[Kevin Leonard]

Originally Posted by evanperryg

Yep.
1) 234
2) 135
3) 1720
4) 5188
5) 1501



"Far more dominant" you mean they singlehandedly outscored every other robot in the world on a regular basis?

1) 254
2) 1678
3) 973
4) 971
5) 1671

Here's a couple others:
Minnesota
1) 3130
2) 2512
3) 2502
4) 2052
5) 2169

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in idaho...

Missouri:
1)1730
2)1806
3)1986
4)3284
5)1723

I think you need to include 1717 in your CA list. All of the robots below were either the #1 pick or #1 seed in their division, and while 1671 was obviously incredible, they were a much later pick and didn't have the upsides of some of the other machines on this list. (3476 would also go above 1671 due to their higher point ceiling).
1) 254 (Carson #1 seed)
2) 1678 (Newton #1 pick)
3) 1717 (Carver #1 pick)
4) 973 (Carson #1 pick)
5) 971 (Carver #1 seed)

[Citrus Dad]

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard

I think you need to include 1717 in your CA list. All of the robots below were either the #1 pick or #1 seed in their division, and while 1671 was obviously incredible, they were a much later pick and didn't have the upsides of some of the other machines on this list. (3476 would also go above 1671 due to their higher point ceiling).
1) 254 (Carson #1 seed)
2) 1678 (Newton #1 pick)
3) 1717 (Carver #1 pick)
4) 973 (Carson #1 pick)
5) 971 (Carver #1 seed)

1671 underperformed during Newton qualifications relative to what they did in their two regionals. They seeded 2nd at Sac ahead of us. This year CA was dominated by NorCal teams (adding 973 to that group for convenience). 2085 and 701 may have been better than any of the SoCal teams as well given what I saw on the webcasts. 1717 wasn't the best of the SoCal teams this year. It's hard to measure how they did because their division was relatively weak.

[MikLast]

Originally Posted by evanperryg

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in idaho...

yes, about 15...

[evanperryg]

Originally Posted by MikLast

yes, about 15...

!!! No video for most of them, but based on their event performances:
1) 2122
2) 2130
3) 3562
4) 3513
5) 2594

Interesting that a lot of the teams listed on FIRST team search are defunct, even when you filter it for 2015 teams only. I put 1671 on my top 5 primarily for the fact that they won the championship, I tried to rank teams not only by their individual performances but by what they achieved with their alliances.

[gcgeobuff]

Originally Posted by evanperryg

Idaho
1)2122
2)2122
3)2122
4)2122
5)...is there another team in Idaho...

For Idaho:
1. 2122
2. 3562
3. 2130
4. 2594
5. 5489

Honorable mentions: 3513, 1569

[RKazmer]

Originally Posted by Lij2015

I'll take a stab at Virginia:

1. 2363/384 (2 capped 6 stacks from HP and some change)
3. 623 (2 capped 5 stacks from HP)
4. 1731 (Only bot I saw pull off 3 tote at the Va regional, landfill 6 stacks)
5. 1086 (Probably the second best landfill bot in our state, most consistent)

I would put 384 slightly above 2363 for consistency in play not to mention that they made Galileo Finals. While 2363 has the 2 capped six stacks, 384 seems a bit faster and more consistent. The thing that 2363 has over 384 is landfill capability.

[The other Gabe]

Originally Posted by RKazmer

I would put 384 slightly above 2363 for consistency in play not to mention that they made Galileo Finals. While 2363 has the 2 capped six stacks, 384 seems a bit faster and more consistent. The thing that 2363 has over 384 is landfill capability.

2 6 stacks from landfill> 2 6 stacks from feeder: landfill is usually much harder. for example, my team could consistently get a capped 6 from the landfill. we ramped from the feeder 1 time and got a capped 6 & uncapped 4, with nearly no practice from that position