|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
Also for a four team alliance I would add 4967(the team i'm on). Not just because I could, but because our team has a decent landfill bot(1-2 six stack with RC and litter plus any extra we can do) but also because our drive team has really good strategy's that we can used in multiple different situations. We also have a four tote landfill auton, so while another team does there 20 point auton, we are still setting up for telop. Last edited by halowaffle47 : 02-06-2015 at 16:45. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Here are my thoughts for CT:
195 CyberKnights As the king of stacking for New England, its impossible to leave the CyberKnights out of this alliance. 3 six stacks, all capped and noodled. Furthermore, they undoubtedly have the fastest canburglar in CT. 2067 Apple Pi I'll try not to be biased toward my own team ![]() In the landfill, 2067 can do two capped six stacks. It's not 100%, but I think its good enough to be the choice for the landfiller. Additionally, 2067 can grab cans in auto. Its fairly quick, though not nearly as fast as 195. Third robot is trickier; there are multiple contenders. I'll give three candidates: 2836 Team Beta Consistent two six stacks from the human player. Their consistency in what they do has paid off, helping them to earn the #1 seed in Galileo and #1 at CT champs. 2170 Titanium Tomahawks Another human player robot capable of two six stacks. The Titanium Tomahawks have really had a good season with this nicely performing machine. Since they do the same thing as Beta, I guess it comes down to which one performs more consistently. 228 GUS GUS started off with a rough season, but has gotten really good recently. They are capable of at least two six stacks, though they sometimes drop them, probably more frequently than 2836/2170. However, in a good match, they can really shine. In 2836/3647's battlecry match with their 10 stacks, you can see 228 quietly working on the other side of the field. That match, they put up three capped six stacks. I havent seen enough matches to know how often 228 can do two, or how often they can do three, but I'd say they're definitely a contender for this power alliance. Last edited by cjl2625 : 02-06-2015 at 15:39. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Thank you for putting 1640 on your MAR alliance. Just a afterthought add on a 20 pt. autonomous.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
I didn't watch much of 67 in St. Louis. If they were able to get reliability up then I would do 1023-548-67.
I might also consider 503 in the third position depending on the landscape of the event. They are the fastest canburglars in MI as far as I know, and if a choke hold strategy is viable then I would pick 1023-548-503. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
Quote:
I did an Illinois one earlier, but here's one for the Midwest (excluding MI) 2481: good can pullers, one of the best landfillers in the world. I haven't gotten to see their pullers myself, but I've heard a lot of really good things about them. 1756: good can pullers, can ramp load 3 6 stacks capped. They could also handle landfill, but both 2481 and 1756 would score the most points if 1756 stayed at their long ramp. Their ramp also folds up, so it won't be in the way of 2826's auto. 2826: by far the best auto in the world, possibly the best robot in the world. Nothing to explain here, they're incredible. Every robot here is capable 3 6es capped, or more. Under IRI rules, a single alliance could have access to up to 9 cans, assuming the other alliance doesn't get theirs in auto, so there's potential for a ridiculous score. 2826 would have to be attached to 1756's ramp, but they showed off a tethered ramp in their pre-champs reveal, so I wouldn't be worried about a drop in performance. 1756 would take one of the preload cans, and the other would be placed sideways in the staging zone so they could get to it quickly after their first stack. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Any match video of this?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
There's a right and left side to the hooks and they're removed for transport configuration. One pin in each on the field and they're ready to go. Because of some confusion in queue, they were switched. The pins didn't match the holes, and we incorrectly thought that was because something got bent in the previous match tug-of-war with 1538. The head ref was starting to get antsy about how long we were taking so I just shoved it down as hard as I could and hoped we'd hook the can and be out of there before anybody else had a chance to grab on. I didn't know that our HP was having the same problem on the other hook, or we might have put 2+2 together and figured out they were switched. To make it even worse, we had shortened our go-forward distance to avoid interfering with 234's 20-pt auton, and something didn't work so we didn't move at all. We got down into the holes pretty quickly... and just sat there. The surgical tubing on the hooks is just to pull the arms back down under the height limit, they weren't intended to withstand the force of two robots pulling in opposite directions. Either that, or it was all a diabolical ploy to bait an unsuspecting alliance into the most awesome tug of war of the season. I'll leave that up to the reader to decide. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
That was 5027. They were on our SVR alliance and they were using the hooks we left with them. No match video up yet on that one.
Last edited by Citrus Dad : 13-06-2015 at 19:48. Reason: fixed an error |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: State Power Alliances 2015
This isn't any easier than the top 5 teams from your state...
Code:
Regular IRI/CC Rule Changes NorCal 254, 1678, 971 254, 1678, 1671 SoCal 3476, 973, 1717/3309 3476, 973, 1717/3309 All 254, 1678, 973 254, 1678, 1671/3476 1. I'm assuming 254 could do LF only if they wanted (as far as I know, they never have, but I'm also pretty sure 1678/971/1671/3476 do HP only). 2. I still cannot figure out if 973 counts as northern or southern CA--they're basically right between San Jose and LA. 3. For 3476+973+1717/3309, I'm assuming 973 does HP, but for 254+1678+973 I'm assuming they do LF. 4. To create the alliances, I prioritized getting one LF bot / two HP, two 2C autos, and then stacking ability. For IRI/CC changes, I changed it to one 2C auto and put stacking ability higher. 5. This was the data I used to decide on the alliances. I'm not sure how accurate it is for the teams I haven't seen in person (especially those in southern CA). Code:
Team Stacks Number Height Auto Notes 254 LF + HP 1 + 2-3 6T+C+N 3T Both LF+HP (total stacks 3-4) 1678 HP 3 5T+C+N 3T/2C 1671 HP 3 6T+C+N 971 HP 2-3 6T+C+N 2C 2085 HP 2 6T+C 701 HP 2 6T+C 3476 HP 3 6T+C+N 973 LF/HP 2-3 6T+C/+N 2C Either LF or HP, 6T+C for LF, 6T+C+N for HP 1717 LF 2-3 6T+C 3T 3309 LF 2-3 6T+C 3T 330 HP 2-3 6T+C |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|