
01-09-2015, 21:54
|
 |
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
 FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,721
|
|
|
Re: ThunderHex inspired question
To add another data point, my old team used 6061 in drive shafts back in 2011 and we had several failures, most often at the center shaft between the gearbox and the power transmission. It is really not too difficult in a drivetrain to fail 6061 hex shaft and thus I really don't think there's much use for it when 7075 is so readily available.
To answer the OP's question, as to why not just use 14mm bearings with hex shaft turned to 14mm max diameter a la ThunderHex. That's a perfectly viable solution and you'll probably find success if you give it a try. The reason that regular 14mm metric ID bearings aren't used with the ThunderHex system is that these bearings aren't readily available in the FRC psuedo standard 1.125" OD for obvious reasons. I'm guessing the designers at Vex realized they had to make custom bearings anyway, and thus decided to go with a slightly more optimal but less standard size for the ThunderHex ID.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
|