|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Hey. I noticed on the FIRST website that Georgia districts are abbreviated PCH. So, FiM stands for FIRST in Michigan and IN stands for Indiana so I was expected Georgia to be like FiG or GA. Any ideas on what PCH stands for? Could it be Peach?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Peachtree, just like CHS stands for Cheese, I mean Chesapeake.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Last year China had 23 teams.
I split Canada just to show which provinces have the most growth. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
It is amazing that already China has the third highest number of registered teams (granted, Israel still has many more yet to show up, but still...)
I wonder how long it will be until China surpasses Canada. 2018? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
That's plausible but they'd need a second regional and probably a third assuming each team goes to 1 regional and each regional holds 60 teams. How many Canada teams are there in all? I'm assuming around 150.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's technically the Regional Director's call. Some RDs may choose to include their committees on these decisions. Your mileage may vary. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Weird, Guilford County took a spot off its total count. Went from 31/33 to 31/32 some time in the last 24 hours.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Registration 2016
what regionals and districts have open spots still?
so many international teams at canadian regionals and so many canadians at regionals outside of canada |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
You can see for yourself here: http://173.255.246.196/2016/
Do remember that there are generally more slots than shown that get served out to waitlisted teams, late registering rookies, etc. Regionals with general admission slots available: Dates -------------------- Event Name ---------Filled - Left - Total 09-Mar - 12-Mar -- Arkansas Rock City Regional -- 43 ----- 9 ---- 52 16-Mar - 19-Mar -- Utah Regional ----------------- 37 ---- 12 ---- 49 23-Mar - 26-Mar -- North Bay Regional ------------ 30 ----- 8 ---- 38 30-Mar - 02-Apr -- Idaho Regional ---------------- 22 ---- 13 ---- 35 31-Mar - 03-Apr -- Hub City Regional ------------- 40 ----- 3 ---- 43 03-Apr - 06-Apr -- Western Canada Regional ----- 33 ----- 5 ---- 38 Districts showing open spots: Dates -------------------- Event Name -------------------------------------------------- Filled - Left - Total 18-Mar - 20-Mar -- CHS District - Northern Maryland Event ---------------------------------- 32 ----- 2 ---- 34 17-Mar - 19-Mar -- PCH District - Albany Event ----------------------------------------------- 18 -- 14 -- 32 17-Mar - 19-Mar -- PCH District - Dalton Event ------------------------------------------------ 29 -- 3 -- 32 18-Mar - 20-Mar -- MAR District - Springside Chestnut Hill Event ---------------------------- 27 -- 2 -- 29 18-Mar - 20-Mar -- NE District - UMass-Dartmouth Event ------------------------------------ 30 -- 1 -- 31 24-Mar - 26-Mar -- NE District - Rhode Island Event ------------------------------------------ 33 -- 2 -- 35 18-Mar - 20-Mar -- NC District - UNC Asheville Event ----------------------------------------- 21 -- 15 -- 36 01-Apr - 03-Apr -- NC District - Campbell University/Johnston Community College Event -- 31 -- 1 -- 32 03-Mar - 05-Mar -- PNW District - West Valley Event ------------------------------------------ 34 -- 2 -- 36 24-Mar - 26-Mar -- PNW District - Philomath Event ------------------------------------------- 28 -- 8 -- 36 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
QCR has already let a team in off of waitlist. A Colombian Rookie team from Medellin, Team 6159.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Waterloo 2005 ran with 24 teams, and went with 7 alliances of 3 in the eliminations rounds.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Registration 2016
Why did 3 teams sit out?
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2016
I guess that would imply 1st alliance to have no choice on the last robot, even if that robot isn't working at all
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|