Go to Post You're never too cool for a giant conga line around an arena. - Michelle 236 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2015, 22:07
jman4747's Avatar
jman4747 jman4747 is offline
Just building robots
AKA: Josh
FRC #4080 (Team Reboot)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 418
jman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond reputejman4747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
We're not in the real world. This discussion is clearly about FRC and there really can be no debate that for FRC hex is a superior product.
Looks real to me.

I would argue that we are in the real world and that our application has parameters that support the common use of 7075 anodized hex shaft. I believe the best practice not to make a blanket statement about material usage and instead to state it's usefulness in terms of our application.

Saying round shaft is always inferior isn't true. Even in FRC there are times when we may be better served with round shaft. I would never tell my students to always use hex or round shaft or aluminum or steel. I train them to pick the best thing for that application. If we have sponsor that will buy half a robots worth of hardware from mcmaster and machine shop that doesn't have hex broaches then round shaft might be a better choice that time around.

Oh and...

4. round shaft couplings and collars are easier to produce (again depending on required tolerances/features)
__________________
---------------------
Alumni, CAD Designer, machinist, and Mentor: FRC Team #4080

Mentor: Rookie FTC Team "EVE" #10458, FRC Team "Drewbotics" #5812

#banthebag
#RIBMEATS
#1620

Last edited by jman4747 : 05-11-2015 at 22:11.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2015, 23:12
R.C.'s Avatar
R.C. R.C. is online now
2017... Oooh Kill em, Swerve!
AKA: Owner, WestCoast Products
FRC #1323 (MadTown Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Madera, CA
Posts: 2,172
R.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Quote:
Originally Posted by jman4747 View Post
Looks real to me.

I would argue that we are in the real world and that our application has parameters that support the common use of 7075 anodized hex shaft. I believe the best practice not to make a blanket statement about material usage and instead to state it's usefulness in terms of our application.

Saying round shaft is always inferior isn't true. Even in FRC there are times when we may be better served with round shaft. I would never tell my students to always use hex or round shaft or aluminum or steel. I train them to pick the best thing for that application. If we have sponsor that will buy half a robots worth of hardware from mcmaster and machine shop that doesn't have hex broaches then round shaft might be a better choice that time around.

Oh and...

4. round shaft couplings and collars are easier to produce (again depending on required tolerances/features)
Your not really at at a real world job. Your in a HS competition where the best choice is clearly ThunderHex or Hex Shafting for most applications if not close to all.

While I agree on the blanket statement, the round shafting is clearly the 1%/minority here. Round shafting + key ways are a major pain and I can't think of a situation where in FRC I'd really want to use round. Most likely if we come to a situation where do we want to use Key'd shafting we'd probably redesign or re evaluate our design.
__________________
R.C.
Owner, WestCoast Products || Twitter
MadTown Robotics Team 1323
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2015, 23:47
page2067's Avatar
page2067 page2067 is offline
Registered User
AKA: rick page
FRC #2067 (Apple Pi)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Guilford CT
Posts: 107
page2067 has a spectacular aura aboutpage2067 has a spectacular aura aboutpage2067 has a spectacular aura about
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Why we need this:

A 3/8" hex bore bearing with a 0.875" OD
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2015, 23:58
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,211
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Quote:
Originally Posted by page2067 View Post
Why we need this:

A 3/8" hex bore bearing with a 0.875" OD
Because when I'm using 3/8" hex shaft it's very convenient.
Also I forgot to mention: 3/8" hex versahubs and sprockets! Or a 3/8" hex to 1/2" sleeve if that's not possible.
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>

Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-11-2015, 00:03
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 602
Jared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory View Post
We're not in the real world. This discussion is clearly about FRC and there really can be no debate that for FRC hex is a superior product.
I'd take hex over round 99 out of 100 times for transmitting torque, but I don't agree with a blanket statement that says hex is always the way to go, especially considering budget. It's undeniably cheaper to drive a McMaster Carr Sure-Grip wheel with a round shaft than a hex shaft.

Putting a hex in a 1.25" hardened steel worm is impossible for most teams that don't have access to a wire edm. Using a keyed shaft would be a better solution, especially if there isn't room in the worm for a 3/8" hex.


If you have a set of two driven rollers or wheels with a pair of bearings in between, you're forced to use a hex bearing here. The inner race of the hex bearing is much weaker than the inner race of the round bearing and has a sloppy fit. I'm pretty sure 254 solved this problem in the past on their outer wheels by using 1/2" keyed shaft...
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-11-2015, 00:05
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 732
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared View Post
If you have a set of two driven rollers or wheels with a pair of bearings in between, you're forced to use a hex bearing here. The inner race of the hex bearing is much weaker than the inner race of the round bearing and has a sloppy fit. I'm pretty sure 254 solved this problem in the past on their outer wheels by using 1/2" keyed shaft...
No, they used 7/16" hex at the wheels.
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2015, 22:06
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 732
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Re: New Products for 2016: Speculation, Wants

Quote:
Originally Posted by jman4747 View Post
2. Round shaft depending on how it's machined will hold tighter tolerances than hex shaft which can be unbelievably important in various real world applications
In the "real world", could you also just clamp the shaft instead?
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:51.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi