|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Team Update 1
http://www.firstinspires.org/sites/d...al/2016/01.pdf
Update 1 has been released. G11 issue settled! Last edited by SteveGPage : 12-01-2016 at 23:45. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
It seems its a little late (time wise, not date wise) for this to be released, good catch!
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
The update to G21 is clear but potentially concerning. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
New, but awesome. Here are the direct links:
Blue End: https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...BlueEnd.vr.jpg Center: https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...6Center.vr.jpg Red End https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...6RedEnd.vr.jpg Spy Box: https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...6SpyBox.vr.jpg |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Well, that settles the G11/G21 discussions pretty thoroughly.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The update to G21 seems a little too much. It's not a clarification, but an entirely different rule. Why'd they make it regardless of who touches who?
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
Basically, the situation was that if Blueabot was in RedaPassage, and Redabot came along and hit Blueabot, TECHNICALLY (due to the usage of "contact" as a verb), Blueabot didn't contact Redabot, so Blueabot doesn't get a penalty; Redabot is blocked from using RedaPassage (potentially), and Redabot is at risk of a G11 for trying to cause Blueabot to get a penalty (but there's a risk of it going to Blueabot for a strategy aimed at trying to get Redabot a G11 penalty). By clarifying that it's regardless of who initiates the contact, the GDC ensures that the Passage remains open, the G11 loop doesn't start, and removes any ambiguity. But, they also allow Blueabot (in the above example) to enter, thus ensuring that a different chokehold (hoarding balls in the Passage) doesn't happen. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
If the Boulder props open the door so I can back of into the neutral zone? If the Boulder is in the moat, and I drive over the boulder? I wonder what prompted that clarification? I noticed there wasn't any clarification regarding spys and carrier pigeons. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
I'm sure the carrier pigeons update will be forth coming! Steve |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Looks like the GDC reacted solidly to several whispers on the wind. I hope they are ready for the true storm when Q+A shows up.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
No drones.....Lol. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1
Hard to disagree with the intent, but the "intent" wording of the new blue box opens up a gigantic can of worms for referees.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|