|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Hi Boltman,
Glad to hear you'll be trying again next year! Hope the eye exam today goes well, people on here seem to think you need one... I had a question about that one rookie team you keep talking about. You said they were low goal, had a strong shot, and were hard to play defense on? Could you help me understand how this happens. I thought a low robot would have a straight shot that is easy to block if they are low that's why I thought tall teams would be good this year. Thanks for explaining this my fastener friend. Best Regards, RM |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
They were paired with 1323 in eliminations and many times both of them simultaneously hit the HG and 1323 was on of my top HG scouted bots they just need more consistency.... 5817 once locked in does not seem to ever miss and its a straight trajectory to the goal. The only reason they did not rank higher was their multiple issues with their swerve. I would put them (when working ) right behind 254, 1678 and on par with 973 when they are on so that is really good HG company to keep. The swerve though makes them in ways harder to defend sometimes if you cannot move like they do. Actually I am surprised 1678 and 254 alliance won so handily in Finals versus 1323 and 5817s alliance but I did not see it first hand as we were packing up. Probably I gather it might have been a boulder starvation thing only so many boulders with high flying HG bots. Last edited by Boltman : 17-03-2016 at 14:59. |
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
|
|
#79
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
This cannot be understated.
3970's defense effectiveness was incredible. They kept our opponents to less than 100 pts in every one of our playoff matches, which helped keep our victory margins high. I was very impressed with how focused 3970 was throughout the playoffs. I personally really enjoyed working with them! It will be interesting to see how defense evolves as more teams begin to increase their high goal consistency. -Mike |
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
|
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
So question... I sort of did this. I can't name the top 25 teams because I don't have time to watch all events or know that much about the teams. This past week I filled out probably the top 15 or so that I could think of from the events that I watched (GTR, Tippecanoe, and CVR) and tried to order them in what I thought was fair. After that I went and put down team # -1 for the other 10 or so spots that were left. So because I put down none competing/nonexistent teams does the rest of my poll get thrown out??? [sorry Boltman you weren't on my list but in every other Top 25 poll I will put 5137 down as my "-1"] [also everytime that I wrote the word poll on here I kept typing pole as I am thinking about how huge a pole 254/1678 have/had] |
|
#82
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
In the future, I expect more pole parity. #teampole -Mike |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
The number of times you've repeated this when referencing 5817...
We get it. You don't need to keep typing this. |
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
^ See virtually no one can list top 25 accurately in any given set of weeks and many will struggle to fill solid selections past 10-15 Top 10 sure otherwise they are just empty blanks filled by teams you may know their # or nonsense Trying to judge performance cross event is mystifying too as some events are much stronger than others even within a state like CA. I would struggle to accurately rank 3021 "winning HG shooting captain" in SD versus the CVR top field..different types of game play at each event. I saw both events and know how to scout and watched pretty much every game. Put 3021 in CVR mix where do they place?? Not sure until I see it happen. For example defense was much more brutal in SD than CVR so one has to take that into account. But you would not know that unless you saw both events. Last edited by Boltman : 17-03-2016 at 16:00. |
|
#85
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
I'd rather keep the current system though, because it's all in good fun. I suppose if you want to be super official, best-of-the-best, you can start your making your way to IRI |
|
#86
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
I don't like those odds when we play you without that handicap. |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
|
|
#88
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
I predicted at the beginning of the year that the high score will be 270. Now I'm pretty sure that's achievable with refinement of auto, climbing and high goal shooting, but it won't happen until Champs. |
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
Maybe you can start your own show and name it "Serious" where you can spend hours and hours trying to predict and rank the best teams from 1-25 for the very important reason of.... uhhh..... I guess we will get back to you on that one. Last edited by BrennanB : 17-03-2016 at 16:53. |
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FUN] FRC Top 40 Week 2 and Rant About Replays
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|