|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
I don't know where I heard they didn't, but thanks for correcting me!
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
We didn't have vision, but we weren't that successful anyways
![]() #lazyprogrammers |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
120 did not use vision processing. They had a clear plastic sheet over the camera feed on their laptop with markings for the goal.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
I would like to give a shout out to 5813, Morpheus, rookies from Concord, New Hampshire. They were putting at least 7-8(maybe more?) high goals in the Galileo division. They also had an effective intake/cheval mechanism and the capability to auto the Cheval.
Their robot was a great example of designing to one's capability, and they showed that vision wasn't needed to be elite. They were also very fun to work with at WPI and Battlecry! 1058 also comes to mind. I think I remember seeing them do 9-10 high goals in a match. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
I'll throw in my suggestion for 4564. #1 seed at WPI, Semifinalists, #1 seed at NECMP, Finalists, and only a flashlight.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Most Successful Robot without Vision
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|