|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 6 wheel drop center drive train
For reference, we used 3/16" drop with the AM pneumatic wheels. Zero issues with turning. Our setup was not standard tho. We had 8WD but performed more like a wide 6WD; our front wheels were raised 2" off the ground. So for us 3/16" was plenty.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 6 wheel drop center drive train
Quote:
We historically have tried to minimize the drop for better or worse. This year we were able to pull off 3/32 on the 8in AM pneumatic wheels. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 6 wheel drop center drive train
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 6 wheel drop center drive train
Quote:
You can see this effect in games like 2012, teams who built wide robots did not need a drop center at all in order to turn. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 6 wheel drop center drive train
Quote:
@ ModMaster: I know the physics, at least in broad terms. You simply rehashed the broad physics without giving any numbers--even situational ones--to back up your assertion that "this dimension is the best". Just so you're aware, I was a student back when the WCD was introduced, in the area it was introduced in, and had the opportunity to learn about that drive, including the drop, from the teams that developed it. If you're going to assert a blanket statement that "X is the best", this is a group of engineering types. You'll get an average of 1.33 counter-anecdotes per person on it not being optimal for a different configuration. (BTW, remember that 85% of statistics are made up on the spot--but in this post, it's 66%.) |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 6 wheel drop center drive train
Quote:
Like I said, our practice bot ran 1/4" without issues for weeks. Factors like the length of the wheelbase, number of wheels, weight, and tire pressure are all things to be considered. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|