Go to Post I come to Chief Delphi to get away from the mundane, everyday news. It's part of what makes the forum appealing to me. If I want to read world news, I'll go to digg. - Ryan Dognaux [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > CAD
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-06-2016, 03:58
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,202
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
How 3D is becoming less relevant for me

A little while back, I was thinking about how I actually use CAD nowadays. As I get better and better at CAD, I found myself relying on sketches more and more and on features and parts less and less; now I'm able to refine my layouts to the point where I can take a layout sketch that I've been working on for 6 hours and turn it into a full gearbox in 2. They're not even particularly complex layouts; it's how I apply them that has changed.
The key to it is not just how I use sketches nowadays, but also how I think about them. When I first started using them (back in late 2014 for ABS-101 and stuff) I didn't think much about their eventual result; I just went step by step in making holes in plates and went back to move them around if they didn't work in 3D- a few relations defined how far apart gears were to each other, and that's about it. But as I got better and better at visualizing how everything fits together in the 3D sense, I'm now thinking about how the gearbox will look in the end as I make the layout.
Thinking with depth in mind has opened up new worlds with layout sketches and makes designs possible that previously I wouldn't have thought of, like cases where gears appear to hit spacers but actually end up in different planes. As many know, using layout sketches often makes designing faster because even the worst computer can deal with a single sketch very fast, so I didn't need to wait on large 3D assemblies to update themselves. In fact, after some time, the 3D aspect of CAD became less and less relevant; it's only a minor tool that I use as a final check of depth and fittings. It's ironic that as I use more and more 3D CAD, I get more and more accustomed to using 2D instead of 3D. Nowadays about half my projects never make it past layout stage because either a) they're unworkable or b) I already know what the 3D version will look like. It's like going for full completion in a video game after finishing the main storyline; sometimes I'm up to it, other times I'm not.
Maybe it's just a side effect of not having a powerful enough computer, but I thought that shift from 3D to 2D was interesting. Has anybody else experienced this sort of change as they've gone through using CAD?
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>

Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi