Go to Post Engineers are not eligible to join NEMO, but that's OK! For us, there is an ad-hoc disorganization, notionally dubbed EMO. Meetings have no agenda and are called at random, usually in the evenings following long days at FIRST events. - Richard Wallace [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-17-2016, 12:04 AM
Bkeeneykid's Avatar
Bkeeneykid Bkeeneykid is online now
#wheatcoastneatcoast
AKA: Devin Keeney
FRC #1982 (Cougar Robotics); Season Long Fantasy FIRST (F3)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Lenexa, Kansas
Posts: 270
Bkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud ofBkeeneykid has much to be proud of
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbysq View Post
Edit: The DMC-60 appears to have VERY similar mounting capabilities to the Talon SR. The bolt hole distance is the same and there are some zip tie grooves in the same place. It also appears that one could use them as a drop-in replacement for them.
Did you mean the Talon SRX? It says on the product page it's a drop in replacement for the Victor SP, but it's size the same as the SRX. If it was a drop in replacement for the SRX, it should have CAN, but it's too large to be a "drop in" replacement for the SP.
__________________

F4 Network Website Designer

2010-2012: A Whole Buncha FLL Teams; Team Spirit, Gracious Professionalism Award winner
2015-Current: FRC 1982, Captain, Electrical Lead
Beginning FIRST Volunteer

Moderator on the FIRSTwiki
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-17-2016, 12:28 AM
bobbysq bobbysq is offline
Registered User
FRC #4646 (Team ASAP)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 249
bobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud of
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bkeeneykid View Post
Did you mean the Talon SRX? It says on the product page it's a drop in replacement for the Victor SP, but it's size the same as the SRX. If it was a drop in replacement for the SRX, it should have CAN, but it's too large to be a "drop in" replacement for the SP.
I actually meant the Victor SP. It's about the same width, so it should fit in with some clearance for most people's mounting configurations, provided you didn't rely on the length too much. I'm not sure why one would want this though, but if I were to guess, they're just trying to establish a standard for motor controller sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-20-2016, 12:23 PM
bobbysq bobbysq is offline
Registered User
FRC #4646 (Team ASAP)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 249
bobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud ofbobbysq has much to be proud of
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP

Did anyone in the beta get offered to test these? If so, could you try some tests to figure out the general quality of the new motor controllers?
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-20-2016, 01:36 PM
Mark McLeod's Avatar
Mark McLeod Mark McLeod is online now
Just Itinerant
AKA: Hey dad...Father...MARK
FRC #0358 (Robotic Eagles)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hauppauge, Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,683
Mark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond reputeMark McLeod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP

We haven't seen any for Beta Testing.
Beta Testing this year has been on the software rewrites and updates.
__________________
"Rationality is our distinguishing characteristic - it's what sets us apart from the beasts." - Aristotle
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-16-2016, 11:33 PM
slibert slibert is online now
Software Mentor
AKA: Scott Libert
FRC #2465 (Kauaibots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Posts: 334
slibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud ofslibert has much to be proud of
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basel A View Post
Yeah figured that out about 10 seconds after I posted (that's always how it works of course)
Yes, just to be clear, navX-Micro is definitely legal.

Rather than connect to the MXP port, NavX-Micro connects via USB and I2C and is software compatible with the NavX-MXP libraries. So it's a drop-in addition if you already use NavX-MXP.

Navx-Micro is a great option for teams that have already populated the single RoboRIO MXP port with another MXP board, need a second IMU for turret angle or robot arm angle, or are teams with a limited budget. The 2017 NavX libraries will support multiple NavX-family devices, so you can use both NavX-MXP and NavX-Micro on a single robot - even at the full 200 Hz update rate. And even more, there's upcoming support for video processing latency correction to be released soon.

Last edited by slibert : 12-17-2016 at 02:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi