|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP
Did you mean the Talon SRX? It says on the product page it's a drop in replacement for the Victor SP, but it's size the same as the SRX. If it was a drop in replacement for the SRX, it should have CAN, but it's too large to be a "drop in" replacement for the SP.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP
Did anyone in the beta get offered to test these? If so, could you try some tests to figure out the general quality of the new motor controllers?
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP
We haven't seen any for Beta Testing.
Beta Testing this year has been on the software rewrites and updates. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2017 Motor (and Servo?) Controllers and MXP
Quote:
Rather than connect to the MXP port, NavX-Micro connects via USB and I2C and is software compatible with the NavX-MXP libraries. So it's a drop-in addition if you already use NavX-MXP. Navx-Micro is a great option for teams that have already populated the single RoboRIO MXP port with another MXP board, need a second IMU for turret angle or robot arm angle, or are teams with a limited budget. The 2017 NavX libraries will support multiple NavX-family devices, so you can use both NavX-MXP and NavX-Micro on a single robot - even at the full 200 Hz update rate. And even more, there's upcoming support for video processing latency correction to be released soon. Last edited by slibert : 12-17-2016 at 02:11 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|