|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Efficient Points
Quote:
WHAT? Curie, generally considered to be the weakest division going into worlds in 2016, had the highest capture percentage? The only conclusion I can arrive at is the community consensus was based on well known powerhouses. There was in fact a huge struggle among some VERY capable teams. The fact that Curie beat Einstein for capture% (and by a significant percentage) may imply that it can't be quantified with OPR, average score, etc. (granted Einstein is a smaller sample size). Anyway, carry on... Last edited by Skyehawk : 26-01-2017 at 12:55. |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Efficient Points
Not without at least two rotors going. And polls have shown that it's about a 2:1 ratio of gear bots to fuel bots. Will fuel bots be at the top? Maybe. But gear bots will be their first and second picks.
|
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Efficient Points
wait, we can only carry one kind of game piece?
|
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Efficient Points
No, but it's more efficient to focus on one or the other.
|
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Efficient Points
I disagree, if you can do gears quickly, have a hopper, and can gather fuel from the floor you can then score the fuel (either high or low depending on the speed of your dumper/shooter) at a fraction of the time required for a dedicated fuel cycle.
|
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Efficient Points
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|