|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
2 gear autonomous
is there any way to place multiple gears from one robot in autonomous?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
If you can convince an alliance partner to give up theirs and somehow support it fully and drop it in a reliable manner, go for it.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
To kinda elaborate further on Cal's response, no not really. You cannot legally enter your opponent's LAUNCHPAD to get to your retrieval zone, so you can't get to your stock of gears. Even if you could, you cannot go past the white line in the loading lane to load a gear, so that's out. You can't get one out of your own alliance station's loading station because of the same reason. The only way you could do it if both alliance decided to go full scale hard core Cooperition. One alliance gives up their pre loaded gear, puts on a specific spot inside the neutral zone, then the other alliance grabs it after putting a gear into the airship and then putting that second gear into your airship.
In short, no. No team is going to put the time to put this autonomous mode to either never use, or just use to benefit the other alliance only. Bragging points only. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Quote:
That's creative, and I don't think I've heard that idea from anyone before, and I certainly hadn't thought of it myself. I don't think that's how one robot would end up doing a two (or three) GEAR auto, though. There are several threads already that discuss some possibilities that are more likely. It won't happen often, but it will happen that a team gets two GEARS in auto. Last edited by mrnoble : 29-01-2017 at 16:17. Reason: Realized I was being a jerk |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
That's more like what will happen
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
A 2 gear auto is only worth the effort if all 3 gears get placed on a peg and start roters in auto. Otherwise you haven't accomplished anything worthy of the complexity required for this auto.
I'm not saying it won't happen, because teams are clearly looking at it, but I don't see the benefit of it. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Another way to get a GEAR from an alliance partner is to recreate the LIFT on your robot. Lots of robots are relying on the Human Player to lift the GEAR out of their robot already. So a horizontal rod on a vertical actuator might be easier to work with than expecting the alliance partner to drop the GEAR and pick it up then score it. But either way, I still consider placing a GEAR and scoring FUEL to be more beneficial than scoring two GEARs.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Is it possible? Perhaps. Is it really worth it? Probably not. It's much easier to cheesecake a gear holder onto a pushbot rather than come up with a complex auto that drops off a gear, finds and picks up another one, and then navigates back to the peg within about 10 sec (it takes a bit of time to get the gear on and start up the rotor). It's much easier on the human players and the robots if three robots are placing one gear each.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
Cheesecaking a box is easier than cheesecaking a camera and autonomous code to place the gear on a peg. I'd say, cheesecake a "drive forward" bit of auto code for teams that can't do that, and ask them to place their gear precariously on their bumper.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2 gear autonomous
G27. One-GEAR limit. ROBOTS may not control more than one GEAR at a time.
Violation: FOUL. If strategic, TECH FOUL and YELLOW CARD. I mayou just be reading the thread here wrong but it seems add if this rule has been over looked. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|