|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
PBASIC 2.5 Questions
First off, 2.5 is going to be a BETA release. I have composed a poem to relate my experience with beta programs:
Quote:
Next, which runs faster, 2.0 or 2.5? Does anybody know? Anyone planning on running some tests? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I plan on testing the syntax, but since I can't download code to a robot.....The sad part is this:
Everyone is so hyped about the new syntax, and gaming, that they lost the idea that BETA's are not ment for professional, final coding. It's just a matter to calm down a crowd with tear gas so to speak. Calm down the crowd for a bit, and devise (sp?) a new plan on how to finish off the rest of the mob. This is just my opinion. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sadly, I believe that I must agree with oyur view of beta. Since I so abhor waiting (Patience is a virtue... one that I don't have) perhaps I'll just start progamming in 2.0.
I'd like to point out that just because it is going to exist soon doesn't mean you want to religiously wait for it... be productive! Use the existing item while you wait! (For instance, the school that I work at as an after school camp counseler is moving and the campus is getting torn down at the end of the school year. The fridge broke. Typical LAUSD response: The kids can get by without a refrigerator for 5 months... After that it would just have to be moved anyways. Mann.. I kept my lunch in that fridge.) Last edited by Noah : 10-01-2003 at 19:29. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Sorry to hear about the camp...good luck though |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
What was the food?
|
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Back to the topic...
Move this kinda stuff to chit-chat or talk via PM/email/IM--it makes it really hard to have a meaningful discussion about bugs and the new editor.
Back on topic: I personally do not forsee any significant bugs in the "beta" release. Since InnovationFirst obviously was able to use it to create/test the default code, it's fairly safe to assume that it works. Personally, I'm writing my code in 2.5 syntax, even if they never release a new editor. It wouldn't be ideal, but I can always strip the text parsing engine out of RoboEmu and convert my 2.5 program to 2.0 as a last resort. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Back to the topic...
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PBasic 2.5 vs. 2.0 | Anthony Kesich | Programming | 6 | 09-02-2003 22:06 |
| Broken PBASIC 2.5 Complier? | Mike Yan | Programming | 12 | 01-02-2003 09:11 |
| RoboEmu 1.09 (supports PBASIC 2.5) | rbayer | Programming | 22 | 21-01-2003 17:22 |
| PBASIC 2.5 Software supposed to be released TODAY. | Travis Hoffman | Programming | 7 | 13-01-2003 20:43 |
| PBASIC 2.5 answer from Parallax | JasonS | Programming | 6 | 07-01-2003 19:21 |